RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1153350 - haproxy runs as unconfined_service_t even if it is confined
Summary: haproxy runs as unconfined_service_t even if it is confined
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 7.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Grepl
QA Contact: Milos Malik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-10-15 20:18 UTC by Milos Malik
Modified: 2015-03-05 10:46 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.13.1-7.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-05 10:46:02 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:0458 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update 2015-03-05 15:17:00 UTC

Description Milos Malik 2014-10-15 20:18:04 UTC 
Description of problem:
 * haproxy unit file executes a wrapper instead of the binary and the wrapper is labeled bin_t

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-targeted-3.13.1-4.el7.noarch
selinux-policy-3.13.1-4.el7.noarch
haproxy-1.5.4-1.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
# ps -efZ | grep haproxy
unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 root 16266 12359  0 22:16 pts/0 00:00:00 grep --color=auto haproxy
# service haproxy start
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl start  haproxy.service
# ps -efZ | grep haproxy
system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0 root 16285 1  0 22:16 ?      00:00:00 /usr/sbin/haproxy-systemd-wrapper -f /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg -p /run/haproxy.pid
system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0 haproxy 16286 16285  0 22:16 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/haproxy -f /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg -p /run/haproxy.pid -Ds
system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0 haproxy 16287 16286  0 22:16 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/haproxy -f /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg -p /run/haproxy.pid -Ds
unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 root 16291 12359  0 22:16 pts/0 00:00:00 grep --color=auto haproxy
#

Actual results:
 * the service runs as unconfined_service_t

Expected results:
 * the service runs as haproxy_t again
Comment 1 Miroslav Grepl 2014-10-16 13:30:56 UTC 
commit c5c0b4516b2a34522e71d002ebcab4c9c7e6fb32
Author: Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl>
Date:   Thu Oct 16 14:35:44 2014 +0200

    Add labeling for /usr/sbin/haproxy-systemd-wrapper wrapper to make haproxy running haproxy_t.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-05 10:46:02 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0458.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.