Bug 1153734
| Summary: | scap-security-guide: ssg-rhel6-ds.xml contains a 'test' profile | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Martin Žember <mzember> | |
| Component: | scap-security-guide | Assignee: | Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Marek Haicman <mhaicman> | |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | Lenka Špačková <lkuprova> | |
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | 7.0 | CC: | dapospis, ebenes, mhaicman, slukasik | |
| Target Milestone: | rc | |||
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | scap-security-guide-0.1.23-1.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
NO_DOCS
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1199946 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-11-19 11:59:16 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1199946 | |||
|
Description
Martin Žember
2014-10-16 16:28:31 UTC
Thanks for the report, Martin. Will have a look. Jan. I don't know. On the one hand, I understand that the test profile may look as some unpolished left-over. On the other hand there are also reasons to keep it here. There might be a value in keeping the same as the upstream has. The test profile is a quick profile that runs and finishes quickly. The customers that play with upstream SSG (most of them do), may rely on this profile. Additionally, it is extra maintenance task for us to keep this out of ssg. I wouldn't be afraid to make this WONTFIX, I just don't know, what do you think, Jan? (In reply to Šimon Lukašík from comment #4) > I don't know. I am not sure either. > > On the one hand, I understand that the test profile may look as some > unpolished left-over. On the other hand there are also reasons to keep it > here. > > There might be a value in keeping the same as the upstream has. The test > profile is a quick profile that runs and finishes quickly. The customers > that play with upstream SSG (most of them do), may rely on this profile. > Additionally, it is extra maintenance task for us to keep this out of ssg. Agree this will mean extra maintenance at our side (mainly to ensure that add-on will be kept across future versions). > > I wouldn't be afraid to make this WONTFIX, I just don't know, what do you > think, Jan? For now I will try to include this change upstream (was actually thinking how to do that already, but so far didn't find a way). I will keep this bug open a bit longer (try some approaches how to fix this upstream yet). And should this shown to be not feasible / doable upstream, we can decide (even possibly close it) a bit later. Jan, do you think we will be able to "fix" it in rhel-7.2 time frame? In other words, do you want dev_ack+? I understand this is low priority, hardly distinguished from WONTFIX, therefore I ask. (In reply to Šimon Lukašík from comment #6) > Jan, do you think we will be able to "fix" it in rhel-7.2 time frame? In > other words, do you want dev_ack+? > > I understand this is low priority, hardly distinguished from WONTFIX, > therefore I ask. Yes, please ACK+ it. Have got an idea in between how to correct this. Thank you for checking btw. Fixed upstream via: https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/pull/583 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2363.html |