Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1155811 - [RFE] Support Infoblox IPAM appliances as subnet / domain providers
Summary: [RFE] Support Infoblox IPAM appliances as subnet / domain providers
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Foreman Proxy
Version: 6.0.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium with 3 votes
Target Milestone: 6.5.0
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact: Perry Gagne
URL: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues...
Whiteboard:
: 1238690 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1660492
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-10-22 22:00 UTC by Maxim Burgerhout
Modified: 2023-03-24 13:30 UTC (History)
54 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rubygem-infoblox-2.0.4, rubygem-smart_proxy_dhcp_infoblox-0.0.13, rubygem-smart_proxy_dns_infoblox-0.0.6
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-05-14 12:36:15 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Foreman Issue Tracker 8046 0 Normal Resolved Add an infoblox provider for dns/dhcp 2021-02-01 20:13:34 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 657373 0 None None None Never
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2019:1222 0 None None None 2019-05-14 12:36:34 UTC

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2014-10-22 22:02:54 UTC 
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.
Comment 4 Dominic Cleal 2014-10-23 09:30:13 UTC 
Connecting redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/8046 from this bug
Comment 12 Bryan Kearney 2015-07-02 13:11:28 UTC 
*** Bug 1238690 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Bryan Kearney 2015-07-02 13:13:29 UTC 
Connecting redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/10156 from this bug
Comment 15 Bryan Kearney 2015-08-25 18:08:27 UTC 
Upstream bug component is Capsule
Comment 22 Bryan Kearney 2016-05-01 18:04:41 UTC 
Moving to POST since upstream bug http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/8046 has been closed
Comment 34 Bryan Kearney 2017-08-09 14:23:21 UTC 
This is not in 6.3, moving it out.
Comment 36 Neha Samant 2018-01-31 05:33:17 UTC 
Hello team,

Can we have an update on this please?

Regards,
Neha
Comment 38 Flavio 2018-03-13 21:04:02 UTC 
External Bug ID: Red Hat Customer Portal 02054519
Comment 44 Bryan Kearney 2018-07-23 14:46:13 UTC 
This was not delivered with 6.4. Moving to the backlog.
Comment 46 Satellite Program 2018-07-23 16:19:53 UTC 
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite 6 since the upstream issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/8046 has been resolved.
Comment 51 Greg Procunier 2018-09-19 22:26:38 UTC 
My org also uses Satellite 6 and Infoblox.  Given that the upstream issue was resolved over 2 years ago, is there any reason why it hasn't been back-ported into Satellite 6?
Comment 53 bugzillarh 2018-10-31 23:50:02 UTC 
Can we get this in 6.5?  This is another upvote from a large customer with thousands of systems, moving to sat6. Infoblox is in the infrastructure.  Please?
Comment 54 Dru Roland 2019-01-09 18:44:05 UTC 
I would also like to request this plugin be added. We use Satellite and Infoblox as well.
Comment 55 David Thomas 2019-02-28 19:15:30 UTC 
I'm curious if there's an estimated timeline for this yet, as we're also an Infoblox shop looking to leverage Satellite. It seems like some progress is being made, so I hope that means we'll see it in the next release.
Comment 57 andy 2019-04-02 07:23:27 UTC 
We would also be very interested in when this feature will be available in Sat6.
Comment 58 bugzillarh 2019-04-16 18:34:58 UTC 
Reminder and pushing for this to be in next major release.
Comment 59 Lukas Zapletal 2019-04-18 11:23:16 UTC 
Documentation link:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.5-beta/html/provisioning_guide/chap-infoblox-integration
Comment 62 errata-xmlrpc 2019-05-14 12:36:15 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1222
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.