Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1160298 - Unable to clone config_template via the api
Unable to clone config_template via the api
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Satellite 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: API (Show other bugs)
6.0.5
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity high (vote)
: Beta
: Unused
Assigned To: Shlomi Zadok
Katello QA List
http://projects.theforeman.org/issues...
: Triaged
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-11-04 09:10 EST by Kedar Bidarkar
Modified: 2016-07-27 04:46 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-27 04:46:09 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Foreman Issue Tracker 9030 None None None 2016-04-22 11:56 EDT
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:1500 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Satellite 6.2 Base Libraries 2016-07-27 08:24:38 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Kedar Bidarkar 2014-11-04 09:10:31 EST
Description of problem:

Currently only UI supports cloning of config_templates.

But we are not sure how do we check this or test cloning via the api's.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.0.5

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
Not clear as to how test cloning via the api's.

Expected results:
Need a way to test cloning via the api's.

Additional info:
As cloning already works with UI, I am assuming there could be some way to do this, but it's not clear who do we do it via api's.
Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2014-11-04 09:23:01 EST
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.
Comment 3 orabin 2015-01-19 08:48:33 EST
Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/9030 from this bug
Comment 4 Bryan Kearney 2015-01-19 10:04:31 EST
Upstream bug assigned to szadok@redhat.com
Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2015-02-08 14:04:46 EST
Moving to POST since upstream bug http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/9030 has been closed
-------------
Shlomi Zadok
Applied in changeset commit:fa941058eb5b6e3d21096548528a010fe34ca504.
Comment 6 jcallaha 2015-12-18 15:39:13 EST
*** This bug is verified in upstream.  This fix should eventually land in future downstream builds ***
Version Tested:
# rpm -qa | grep foreman
tfm-rubygem-foreman_discovery-4.1.2-1.fm1_11.el7.noarch
tfm-rubygem-foreman_hooks-0.3.9-1.el7.noarch
foreman-debug-1.11.0-0.develop.201512111432git98f6ca5.el7.noarch
tfm-rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_docker-0.0.3-4.el7.noarch
foreman-ovirt-1.11.0-0.develop.201512111432git98f6ca5.el7.noarch
foreman-postgresql-1.11.0-0.develop.201512111432git98f6ca5.el7.noarch
foreman-release-scl-1-1.el7.x86_64
foreman-vmware-1.11.0-0.develop.201512111432git98f6ca5.el7.noarch
tfm-rubygem-foreman_gutterball-0.0.1-3.el7.noarch
foreman-gce-1.11.0-0.develop.201512111432git98f6ca5.el7.noarch
dell-per300-01.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com-foreman-proxy-client-1.0-1.noarch
foreman-release-1.11.0-0.develop.201512111432git98f6ca5.el7.noarch
tfm-rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_tasks-0.0.8-1.el7.noarch
foreman-1.11.0-0.develop.201512111432git98f6ca5.el7.noarch
tfm-rubygem-foreman_docker-1.4.1-2.fm1_10.el7.noarch
foreman-libvirt-1.11.0-0.develop.201512111432git98f6ca5.el7.noarch
dell-per300-01.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com-foreman-client-1.0-1.noarch
dell-per300-01.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com-foreman-proxy-1.0-2.noarch
tfm-rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman-0.4.0-1.201512101420git81ec371.el7.noarch
foreman-compute-1.11.0-0.develop.201512111432git98f6ca5.el7.noarch
tfm-rubygem-foreman-tasks-0.7.6-1.fm1_10.el7.noarch
foreman-selinux-1.11.0-0.develop.201510071426git6234447.el7.noarch
tfm-rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_bootdisk-0.1.3-3.el7.noarch
tfm-rubygem-foreman_bootdisk-6.0.0-2.fm1_10.el7.noarch
foreman-proxy-1.11.0-0.develop.201512101505git62c9e22.el7.noarch
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2016-07-27 04:46:09 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1500

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.