Spec URL: https://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/tcalc.spec SRPM URL: https://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/tcalc-1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: The terminal calculator is a small and helpful program to help users of the GNU/Linux terminal do calculations simply and quickly. The formula to be calculated can be fed to tcalc through the command line. Alternatively, tcalc can be run with no formula and then the free mode is started, in which the calculator will wait for user input, do the necessary calculations and print out the result, and the cycle will repeat until the user enters 'q' or 'quit'. Support for reading formulae from text files is under way. The calculator works with the decimal, hexadecimal, octal, and binary number systems. It automatically identifies hex numbers if entered with a preceding '0x' or '0X', octals by preceding the number with a zero, binaries by preceding the number with 'b' and decimals by absence of all of the above. Alternatively, the user can indicate the type of input by setting the 'format' argument. Fedora Account System Username: mohammedisam
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/tcalc See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles - rpmlint warnings - Compiler flags - License of ltmain.sh ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)". Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1161340-tcalc/licensecheck.txt [!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Texinfo files are installed using install-info in %post and %preun if package has .info files. Note: Texinfo .info file(s) in tcalc [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: tcalc-1.0-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm tcalc-1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm tcalc.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US formulae -> formula, formulate, formulas tcalc.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US octals -> octal, octal s, octavos tcalc.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/tcalc.1.gz 19: warning: macro `0x'' not defined tcalc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US formulae -> formula, formulate, formulas tcalc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US octals -> octal, octal s, octavos tcalc.src:35: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint tcalc tcalc.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US formulae -> formula, formulate, formulas tcalc.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US octals -> octal, octal s, octavos tcalc.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/tcalc.1.gz 19: warning: macro `0x'' not defined 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- tcalc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh /sbin/ldconfig info libc.so.6()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- tcalc: tcalc tcalc(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- http://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/tcalc-1.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : b60cacc36b58ecbbec6a75ac027f73c6e43c7f040b65780c8fa042cebf285817 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b60cacc36b58ecbbec6a75ac027f73c6e43c7f040b65780c8fa042cebf285817 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1161340 Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG Nitpick ------- - The URL doesn't provide any useful information about the tcalc. - tcalc-1.0/ltmain.sh uses GPLv2 or later and not GPLv3 or later
Spec URL: https://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/tcalc.spec SRPM URL: https://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/tcalc-1.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #1) > Issues: > ======= > - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. > Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/tcalc Not addressed > - License of ltmain.sh Not addressed
Spec URL: https://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/tcalc.spec SRPM URL: https://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/tcalc-1.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #3) > (In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #1) > > Issues: > > ======= > > - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. > > Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/tcalc Removed line. > > > - License of ltmain.sh Fixed.
Package APPROVED
(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #6) > Package APPROVED Thanx a lot
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: tcalc Short Description: The terminal calculator Upstream URL: https://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/tcalc Owners: mohammedisam Branches: f19 f20 f21 el6 epel7 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
tcalc-1.3-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcalc-1.3-1.fc19
tcalc-1.3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcalc-1.3-1.fc20
tcalc-1.3-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcalc-1.3-1.fc21
tcalc-1.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcalc-1.3-1.el6
tcalc-1.3-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcalc-1.3-1.el7
tcalc-1.3-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
tcalc-1.3-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
tcalc-1.3-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
tcalc-1.3-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
tcalc-1.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
tcalc-1.3-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
tcalc-1.5-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0fd26dac01
tcalc-1.5-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-252dcd32b1
tcalc-1.5-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4c1a11078f
tcalc-1.5-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1f6149908b
tcalc-1.5-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-c549014a11
tcalc-1.5-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update tcalc' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4c1a11078f
tcalc-1.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update tcalc' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1f6149908b
tcalc-1.5-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update tcalc' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0fd26dac01
tcalc-1.5-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update tcalc' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-252dcd32b1
tcalc-1.5-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update tcalc' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-c549014a11
tcalc-1.5-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
tcalc-1.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
tcalc-1.5-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
tcalc-1.5-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
tcalc-1.5-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.