RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1161745 - docker interferes with firewall initialisation via firewalld
Summary: docker interferes with firewall initialisation via firewalld
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: firewalld
Version: 7.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Thomas Woerner
QA Contact: Tomas Dolezal
Robert Krátký
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1151067 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1098281
Blocks: 1113141 1133060 1205796
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-11-07 18:48 UTC by Daniel Walsh
Modified: 2019-08-15 04:04 UTC (History)
34 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Known Issue
Doc Text:
The docker daemon interferes with the firewalld daemon and prevents firewalld from executing the iptables command. Users of docker should not enable firewalld to prevent this interference.
Clone Of: 1098281
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-19 12:59:38 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:2422 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE firewalld bug fix and enhancement update 2015-11-19 11:22:52 UTC

Comment 3 Jiri Popelka 2014-11-14 12:43:29 UTC
*** Bug 1151067 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Jiri Popelka 2014-11-14 12:45:56 UTC
Whole docker vs. firewalld picture is described in bug #1164243.

Comment 12 Yoana Ruseva 2015-02-19 12:53:26 UTC
Confirmed that this bug has been mentioned in the Docker Quick Start Guide, 
Getting Docker in RHEL 7 section, Step 4:

https://access.redhat.com/articles/881893

Changing the Doc Type to Bug Fix because it will not be included in the RHEL 7 Release Notes.

Comment 15 Thomas Woerner 2015-08-14 09:39:34 UTC
Please remember that this issue has been addressed in docker also. docker and firewalld are now working together. Please have a look at #1245325

Comment 16 Thomas Woerner 2015-08-14 09:40:41 UTC
(In reply to Thomas Woerner from comment #15)
> Please remember that this issue has been addressed in docker also. docker
> and firewalld are now working together. Please have a look at #1245325

Here is the link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245325

Comment 17 Robert Krátký 2015-08-14 10:13:02 UTC
Hi Thomas,

RHEL 7.1 Release Notes already mentioned:

"Firewalld is now supported for docker containers. If firewalld is running on the system, the rules will be added via the firewalld passthrough. If firewalld is reloaded, the configuration will be re-applied."

So I suppose that no RN is required for RHEL 7.2. Correct?

Comment 18 Thomas Woerner 2015-08-14 10:41:00 UTC
Hello Robert,

the doc text of this bug was irritating me a bit. I wanted to make sure that the outdated information will not make it into the errata or the release notes of 7.2.

Regards,
Thomas

Comment 20 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 12:59:38 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2422.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.