Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1162502

Summary: targetd should refuse to start if SSL credentials are missing
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv>
Component: targetdAssignee: Tony Asleson <tasleson>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Martin Hoyer <mhoyer>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.4CC: agrover, mhoyer, mthacker, tasleson
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1162278 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-01 20:43:39 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1162278    
Bug Blocks: 1385242    

Description Bruno Goncalves 2014-11-11 08:03:04 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1162278 +++

from bgoncalv:

I configured targetd to support ssl on yaml file and the service started without problem.

As I didn't create targetd_key.pem nor targetd_cert.pem shouldn't the service fail to start? As it happens if VG or Password are not set.

Comment 1 Bruno Goncalves 2014-11-11 08:03:29 UTC
Just to track the port of the patch to RHEL-7

Comment 5 Tony Asleson 2017-02-06 21:30:09 UTC
What happens is the missing certificate files are not noticed until a client actually tries to use the service.  It would be better to check that the required files are present at start up to ensure that the clients can hopefully connect cleanly.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 290, in _handle_request_noblock
    self.process_request(request, client_address)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 318, in process_request
    self.finish_request(request, client_address)
  File "/home/tasleson/projects/targetd/targetd/main.py", line 160, in finish_request
    suppress_ragged_eofs=True)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/ssl.py", line 943, in wrap_socket
    ciphers=ciphers)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/ssl.py", line 554, in __init__
    self._context.load_cert_chain(certfile, keyfile)
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory

Comment 7 Martin Hoyer 2017-04-28 12:26:16 UTC
Tested with targetd-0.8.5-1.el7, works well.
No regression found.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 20:43:39 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1982