Bug 1163374
| Summary: | Review JDG 6.4 Beta RN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Data Grid 6 | Reporter: | Jiri Pallich <jpallich> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Martin Gencur <mgencur> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.4.0 | CC: | jdg-bugs, mhusnain |
| Target Milestone: | ER5 | ||
| Target Release: | 6.4.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-11-18 11:02:18 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1153109 | ||
|
Description
Jiri Pallich
2014-11-12 15:15:44 UTC
Tristan has reviewed this in another bug. This seems like an unnecessary duplication IMO. Jiri, could we close this bug as a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108442 and set the latter as a blocker? That's where release note tasks are tracked anyway. (In reply to Misha H. Ali from comment #3) How is it tracked in the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108442 that the RN have been reviewed from the technical point of view (Dev and QE)? As long as the original BZ can track it this is indeed a duplicate. Hi Jiri, The Release Notes bug is only closed (as with all docs bugs) after a complete SME and QE review is completed on all text. For release notes in particular, since we add all new text for every release, this is particularly true. I've added a comment to the tracking bug to ask for explicit ACKs on the tech content so we can close off this bug and use the normal RN tracking bug as a blocker if needed instead. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1108442 *** |