Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mizdebsk/gradle-packaging/8b6463901bc7da698124f51203d6fbf5394c5807/gpars.spec SRPM URL: http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mizdebsk/gradle/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/gpars-1.2.1-0.5.fc22/gpars-1.2.1-0.5.fc22.src.rpm Description: The GPars framework offers Java developers intuitive and safe ways to handle Java or Groovy tasks concurrently. Leveraging the enormous flexibility of the Groovy programing language and building on proven Java technologies, we aim to make concurrent programming for multi-core hardware intuitive, robust and enjoyable. GPars is a multi-paradigm concurrency framework, offering several mutually cooperating high-level concurrency abstractions, such as Dataflow operators, Promises, CSP, Actors, Asynchronous Functions, Agents and Parallel Collections. Fedora Account System Username: mizdebsk
*** Bug 854239 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Unowned directory %{_javadir}/gpars - The bundled source for extra166y. Even though the code doesn't use it, it's still built and installed. - There are bundled jars. They are probably not used, but I'd prefer them to be removed in %prep - artwork directory contains icons under cc-by-nc-nd. They should also be removed to ensure they don't end up somewhere - There is a book with examples, do you know anything about it's licensing? I know it's not installed, but I'm not sure whether it should be in the SRPM at all. - gpars.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US programing -> programming ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 25 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/msimacek/reviews/1163724-gpars/licensecheck.txt [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/java/gpars, /usr/share/maven- poms/gpars, /usr/share/maven-metadata [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/maven-poms/gpars, /usr/share/java/gpars, /usr/share/maven-metadata [?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [?]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. Note: Test run failed [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Test run failed [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Note: Test run failed [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. Java: [!]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build Note: Test run failed [x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is pulled in by maven-local Maven: [x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant [x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping [x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used [x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage- utils for %update_maven_depmap macro [x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun [x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [-]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Java: [x]: Package uses upstream build method (ant/maven/etc.) [x]: Packages are noarch unless they use JNI ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Test run failed [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: gpars-1.2.1-0.5.fc22.noarch.rpm gpars-1.2.1-0.5.fc22.src.rpm gpars.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US programing -> programming, monogramming, program gpars.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti gpars.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://gpars.codehaus.org timed out gpars.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US programing -> programming, monogramming, program gpars.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti gpars.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://gpars.codehaus.org timed out 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ]0;<mock-chroot><mock-chroot>[root@unused-4-144 /]# rpmlint gpars gpars.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US programing -> programming, monogramming, program gpars.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ]0;<mock-chroot><mock-chroot>[root@unused-4-144 /]# echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- gpars (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java-headless jpackage-utils mvn(org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all) mvn(org.codehaus.jcsp:jcsp) mvn(org.codehaus.jsr166-mirror:extra166y) mvn(org.jboss.netty:netty:3.6.6.Final) mvn(org.multiverse:multiverse-core) Provides -------- gpars: gpars mvn(org.codehaus.gpars:gpars) mvn(org.codehaus.gpars:gpars:pom:) osgi(gpars.org) Source checksums ---------------- http://github.com/GPars/GPars/archive/release-1.2.1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 6e051c43cbdbab6e1195e98b52c65de79362026e50d80fb91ed4671fa6fd4c07 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6e051c43cbdbab6e1195e98b52c65de79362026e50d80fb91ed4671fa6fd4c07 http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : cfc7749b96f63bd31c3c42b5c471bf756814053e847c10f3eb003417bc523d30 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : cfc7749b96f63bd31c3c42b5c471bf756814053e847c10f3eb003417bc523d30 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1163724 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Java Disabled plugins: C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG
Updated package. %changelog * Mon Nov 17 2014 Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk> - 1.2.1-0.6 - Remove gradle-wrapper bundled JAR - Fix spelling error - Fix ownership of created directories - Unbuldle extra166y - Remove non-free content from source tarball Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mizdebsk/gradle-packaging/8e2a04a568cc7cad806283dce4f9fb7938aa3b1b/gpars.spec SRPM URL: http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mizdebsk/gradle/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/gpars-1.2.1-0.6.fc22/gpars-1.2.1-0.6.fc22.src.rpm
The tarball is now ok, but please include generate-tarball.sh as a source before the import. Otherwise looks good, APPROVED
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: gpars Short Description: Groovy Parallel Systems Owners: mizdebsk gil msimacek msrb Branches: f21 InitialCC: java-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Built for rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8186247