Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1164721 - Packaging gstatus utility with RHS
Packaging gstatus utility with RHS
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: build (Show other bugs)
3.0
Unspecified Unspecified
high Severity unspecified
: ---
: RHGS 3.0.3
Assigned To: Bala.FA
Sachidananda Urs
: ZStream
Depends On:
Blocks: 1162694
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-11-17 03:50 EST by Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana
Modified: 2016-02-17 19:20 EST (History)
12 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: gstatus-0.62-1.el6rhs, redhat-storage-server-3.0.3.1-1.el6rhs
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
gstatus utility is added to the Red Hat Storage Server to provide an easy-to-use, high-level view of the health of a trusted storage pool with a single command. It gathers status/health information of the Red Hat Storage nodes, volumes, and bricks by executing the GlusterFS commands
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-01-15 08:42:28 EST
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:0038 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Storage 3.0 enhancement and bug fix update #3 2015-01-15 13:35:28 EST

  None (edit)
Description Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana 2014-11-17 03:50:32 EST
Description of problem:
gstatus utility must be packaged with RHS.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Bala.FA 2014-11-17 05:49:38 EST
Patch is under review at https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/36770
Comment 3 Atin Mukherjee 2014-11-19 02:00:17 EST
This bug doesn't fall under ateam, hence removing the name from devel whiteboard.
Comment 4 Sachidananda Urs 2014-12-02 10:10:58 EST
Bala you've packaged all the .pyo and .pyc files. Can you remove them and build again?

[root@mater gstatus-0.62]# ls
build  examples  gstatus.egg-info  gstatus.pyc  gstatus.spec  rpms      setup.pyc  todo-list
dist   gstatus   gstatus.py        gstatus.pyo  README        setup.py  setup.pyo
Comment 5 Bala.FA 2014-12-02 11:14:59 EST
I can't understand what you mean.  I don't see .py[co] in source tarball

[bala@localhost gstatus.rhpkg]$ tar -ztf gstatus-0.62.tar.gz 
gstatus-gstatus/
gstatus-gstatus/README
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus.spec
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus.py
gstatus-gstatus/.gitignore
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/classes/
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/classes/gluster.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/classes/__init__.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/functions/
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/functions/config.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/functions/utils.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/functions/network.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/functions/syscalls.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/functions/__init__.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/__init__.py
gstatus-gstatus/examples/
gstatus-gstatus/examples/multi_brick_down
gstatus-gstatus/examples/one_brick_down
gstatus-gstatus/examples/volume_info_with_layout
gstatus-gstatus/examples/healthy_cluster
gstatus-gstatus/examples/one_node_down
gstatus-gstatus/examples/multi_nodes_down
gstatus-gstatus/todo-list
gstatus-gstatus/rpms/
gstatus-gstatus/setup.py
[bala@localhost gstatus.rhpkg]$
Comment 6 Sachidananda Urs 2014-12-03 04:23:43 EST
[root@luigi gstatus-0.62]# pwd
/usr/lib/glusterfs/.unsupported/gstatus-0.62
[root@luigi gstatus-0.62]# ls
examples  gstatus.py   gstatus.pyo   README  setup.py   setup.pyo
gstatus   gstatus.pyc  gstatus.spec  rpms    setup.pyc  todo-list


I see this as part of ISO that was spun on 26th November 2014. We are yet to get the latest ISO, I can verify that and let you know.
Comment 7 Bala.FA 2014-12-03 10:47:00 EST
Is this happening in 'fixed in version' of redhat-storage-server-3.0.3.1-1.el6rhs?
Comment 8 Sachidananda Urs 2014-12-05 01:56:50 EST
I can see this is fixed in current ISO and package attached to errata.

Marking as verified.
Comment 9 Divya 2015-01-07 05:02:28 EST
Bala,

Please review the edited doc text and sign-off.
Comment 10 Bala.FA 2015-01-07 05:36:35 EST
Slightly change the doctext.  It looks good to me now.
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-01-15 08:42:28 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0038.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.