Bug 1164721 - Packaging gstatus utility with RHS
Summary: Packaging gstatus utility with RHS
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: build
Version: rhgs-3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: RHGS 3.0.3
Assignee: Bala.FA
QA Contact: Sachidananda Urs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1162694
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-11-17 08:50 UTC by Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana
Modified: 2016-02-18 00:20 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gstatus-0.62-1.el6rhs, redhat-storage-server-3.0.3.1-1.el6rhs
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
gstatus utility is added to the Red Hat Storage Server to provide an easy-to-use, high-level view of the health of a trusted storage pool with a single command. It gathers status/health information of the Red Hat Storage nodes, volumes, and bricks by executing the GlusterFS commands
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-01-15 13:42:28 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:0038 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Storage 3.0 enhancement and bug fix update #3 2015-01-15 18:35:28 UTC

Description Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana 2014-11-17 08:50:32 UTC
Description of problem:
gstatus utility must be packaged with RHS.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Bala.FA 2014-11-17 10:49:38 UTC
Patch is under review at https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/36770

Comment 3 Atin Mukherjee 2014-11-19 07:00:17 UTC
This bug doesn't fall under ateam, hence removing the name from devel whiteboard.

Comment 4 Sachidananda Urs 2014-12-02 15:10:58 UTC
Bala you've packaged all the .pyo and .pyc files. Can you remove them and build again?

[root@mater gstatus-0.62]# ls
build  examples  gstatus.egg-info  gstatus.pyc  gstatus.spec  rpms      setup.pyc  todo-list
dist   gstatus   gstatus.py        gstatus.pyo  README        setup.py  setup.pyo

Comment 5 Bala.FA 2014-12-02 16:14:59 UTC
I can't understand what you mean.  I don't see .py[co] in source tarball

[bala@localhost gstatus.rhpkg]$ tar -ztf gstatus-0.62.tar.gz 
gstatus-gstatus/
gstatus-gstatus/README
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus.spec
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus.py
gstatus-gstatus/.gitignore
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/classes/
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/classes/gluster.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/classes/__init__.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/functions/
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/functions/config.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/functions/utils.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/functions/network.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/functions/syscalls.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/functions/__init__.py
gstatus-gstatus/gstatus/__init__.py
gstatus-gstatus/examples/
gstatus-gstatus/examples/multi_brick_down
gstatus-gstatus/examples/one_brick_down
gstatus-gstatus/examples/volume_info_with_layout
gstatus-gstatus/examples/healthy_cluster
gstatus-gstatus/examples/one_node_down
gstatus-gstatus/examples/multi_nodes_down
gstatus-gstatus/todo-list
gstatus-gstatus/rpms/
gstatus-gstatus/setup.py
[bala@localhost gstatus.rhpkg]$

Comment 6 Sachidananda Urs 2014-12-03 09:23:43 UTC
[root@luigi gstatus-0.62]# pwd
/usr/lib/glusterfs/.unsupported/gstatus-0.62
[root@luigi gstatus-0.62]# ls
examples  gstatus.py   gstatus.pyo   README  setup.py   setup.pyo
gstatus   gstatus.pyc  gstatus.spec  rpms    setup.pyc  todo-list


I see this as part of ISO that was spun on 26th November 2014. We are yet to get the latest ISO, I can verify that and let you know.

Comment 7 Bala.FA 2014-12-03 15:47:00 UTC
Is this happening in 'fixed in version' of redhat-storage-server-3.0.3.1-1.el6rhs?

Comment 8 Sachidananda Urs 2014-12-05 06:56:50 UTC
I can see this is fixed in current ISO and package attached to errata.

Marking as verified.

Comment 9 Divya 2015-01-07 10:02:28 UTC
Bala,

Please review the edited doc text and sign-off.

Comment 10 Bala.FA 2015-01-07 10:36:35 UTC
Slightly change the doctext.  It looks good to me now.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-01-15 13:42:28 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0038.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.