Bug 1165144 - perl-MooseX-Declare-0.40-1.fc22 requires perl(MooseX::Declare::StackItem) which nobody provides
Summary: perl-MooseX-Declare-0.40-1.fc22 requires perl(MooseX::Declare::StackItem) whi...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: perl-MooseX-Declare
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Emmanuel Seyman
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-11-18 12:34 UTC by Petr Pisar
Modified: 2014-11-20 10:10 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-11-20 07:19:09 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Petr Pisar 2014-11-18 12:34:43 UTC
perl-MooseX-Declare-0.40-1.fc22 has unresolved run-time dependencies:

# LANG=en_US.UTF-8 yum --enablerepo=f22-build install perl-MooseX-Declare
Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo
Resolving Dependencies
[...]
Error: Package: perl-MooseX-Declare-0.40-1.fc22.noarch (f22-build)
           Requires: perl(MooseX::Declare::Syntax::MethodDeclaration::Parameterized)
Error: Package: perl-MooseX-Declare-0.40-1.fc22.noarch (f22-build)
           Requires: perl(MooseX::Declare::StackItem)
Error: Package: perl-MooseX-Declare-0.40-1.fc22.noarch (f22-build)
           Requires: perl(MooseX::Declare::Context::WithOptions)

They were provided by previous perl-MooseX-Declare builds.

Comment 1 Emmanuel Seyman 2014-11-20 07:19:09 UTC
Fixed in 0.40-2 which will hit rawhide on the next push.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8191105

Comment 2 Paul Howarth 2014-11-20 09:49:11 UTC
If upstream considers these packages to be private, perhaps it might be better to hide the "requires" in the perl-MooseX-Declare package rather than explicitly provide them?

Comment 3 Emmanuel Seyman 2014-11-20 10:09:28 UTC
The commit in question is:
https://github.com/moose/MooseX-Declare/commit/291b5892e63a682af013c7e9e30ab8a3ba143e68

The reason given doesn't strike as sufficient to hide these packages in the rpm metadata.

Comment 4 Paul Howarth 2014-11-20 10:10:37 UTC
Fair enough.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.