Bug 1166697 - Review Request: mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good - MinGW build of GStreamer good plugins
Summary: Review Request: mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good - MinGW build of GStreamer good...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: 21
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Marc-Andre Lureau
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-11-21 13:35 UTC by Victor Toso
Modified: 2015-01-03 19:06 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.4.4-1.fc21
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-01-03 19:06:29 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
marcandre.lureau: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Victor Toso 2014-11-21 15:27:33 UTC
I forgot to include the Patch1 URL.
Patch1 URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/0001-rtspsrc-fix-for-mikey-api-change.patch

Comment 2 Marc-Andre Lureau 2014-11-27 14:34:16 UTC
- why did you package 1.3.2 and not 1.4.4 ?
- global gstreamer gstreamer1 doesn't seem to be used
- bogus changelog date

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "LGPL (v2)", "*No copyright* LGPL (v2 or later)", "LGPL (v2 or later)",
     "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like) LGPL (v2
     or later)", "LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "LGPL",
     "BSD (2 clause) GPL (v2 or later)", "BSD (3 clause)", "LGPL (v2.1 or
     later)", "GPL (v2)", "*No copyright* LGPL (v2.1 or later)". 78 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/elmarco/pkg/1166697-mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[?]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/gstreamer-1.0, /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/gstreamer-1.0
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/gstreamer-1.0, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/gstreamer-1.0

Probably should be fixed in gstreamer1

I would own: (like non-mingw package)
{mingw32_datadir}/gstreamer-%{api_version}/presets/

[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.

Unnecessary with 1.4.4 I guess

[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: mingw32-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.3.2-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
          mingw64-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.3.2-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
          mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.3.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
mingw32-gstreamer1-plugins-good.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
mingw64-gstreamer1-plugins-good.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.src:198: W: macro-in-comment %{mingw32_libdir}
mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.src:198: W: macro-in-comment %{api_version}
mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.src:266: W: macro-in-comment %{mingw64_libdir}
mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.src:266: W: macro-in-comment %{api_version}
mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.src: E: specfile-error warning: bogus date in %changelog: Thu Nov 21 2014 - Victor Toso <victortoso> - 1.3.2
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.

Comment 3 Victor Toso 2014-12-01 16:24:47 UTC
(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #2)
> - why did you package 1.3.2 and not 1.4.4 ?
> - global gstreamer gstreamer1 doesn't seem to be used
> - bogus changelog date

Fixed.

Spec URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/1/mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.spec

SRPM URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/1/mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.4.4-1.fc21.src.rpm

Comment 4 Marc-Andre Lureau 2014-12-01 16:38:20 UTC
looks good to me,
with a slightly better changelog comment, with mention to this bug would be nice

Comment 5 Victor Toso 2014-12-01 17:53:20 UTC
(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #4)
> looks good to me,
> with a slightly better changelog comment, with mention to this bug would be
> nice

Included link to this bug

Spec URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/2/mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.spec

SRPM URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/2/mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.4.4-1.fc21.src.rpm

Comment 7 Marc-Andre Lureau 2014-12-08 14:01:33 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good
Short Description: Cross compiled GStreamer1 plug-ins good
Upstream URL: http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/
Owners: victortoso elmarco
Branches: f21
InitialCC:

Comment 8 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-12-08 16:39:03 UTC
WARNING: "victortoso" is not in the packager group.

Comment 9 Victor Toso 2014-12-15 17:05:23 UTC
removing the FE-NEEDSPONSOR

Comment 10 Fabiano Fidêncio 2014-12-15 17:06:55 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good
Short Description: Cross compiled GStreamer1 plug-ins good
Upstream URL: http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/
Owners: elmarco fidencio
Branches: f21
InitialCC:

Comment 11 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-12-15 18:30:01 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2014-12-16 19:18:49 UTC
mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.4.4-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.4.4-1.fc21

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2014-12-18 06:10:16 UTC
mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.4.4-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2015-01-03 19:06:29 UTC
mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.4.4-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.