Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1167688 - [RFE] composite content view should be updated when component CV are updated
Summary: [RFE] composite content view should be updated when component CV are updated
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1177766
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Content Views
Version: 6.0.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Brad Buckingham
QA Contact: Jameer Pathan
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1309944
Blocks: 1296845
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-11-25 09:48 UTC by Sergio Ocón-Cárdenas
Modified: 2022-10-10 13:01 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-09-16 13:36:38 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker SAT-13357 0 None None None 2022-10-10 13:01:15 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 2157641 0 None None None 2016-02-10 16:00:38 UTC

Description Sergio Ocón-Cárdenas 2014-11-25 09:48:51 UTC
Description of problem:
When you create a composite content view, you need to update it separated from the CV of which it consits, what is not obvious

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.0.6 (not available to choose yet)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create 2 CV (i.e. one of them Puppet)
2. Create a composite one included two before
3. Update one of the CV

Actual results:
The Composite CV does not reflect the changes, even if the Puppet CV is set to lastest version

Expected results:
Composite CV is updated with the new versions.

As an alternative:
- A message is shown saying "This CV is part of a Composite CV, you need to update the latest too"

As the preferred option:
- You can choose in Composite CV either a version number or "Latest". In that last case it is automatically refreshed when a new version of the underlying content view is promoted, if you choose a number that version is kept in the composite.


Additional info:
Due to the fact that you can only assign one CV to a system, this mechanism would allow simpler management of the CV.
For instance:
- I generate a CV for Basic RHEL
- I generate a CV for Puppet, this promotes very quickly compared to the former, and I can version it without having to update the former (good to know what I am doing and when)
- I generate another CV for syncrhoniziation of my own packages, again lifecycle of this is complete separated from the others.
- I add all of them into a Composite Content View and assign it to hosts. Whenever I do a change in some CV it is automatically reflected. If I want to keep functionality as of today I just choose one specific version for each underlying CV

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2014-11-25 10:13:52 UTC
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.

Comment 6 Bryan Kearney 2016-07-08 20:24:45 UTC
Per 6.3 planning, moving out non acked bugs to the backlog

Comment 8 Brad Buckingham 2016-09-16 13:36:38 UTC
There is a very similar request in bug 1177766.  Since that request has multiple requests associated to it, I am going to close this one as a duplicate.  If possible, please follow that bugzilla.  Thanks!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1177766 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.