Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 11683

Summary:	require downlevel gtk--
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Powertools	Reporter:	Tim Pepper <rhn>
Component:	cdrdao	Assignee:	Tim Powers <timp>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.2	CC:	eedmoba
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2000-06-28 05:59:55 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Tim Pepper 2000-05-26 03:24:07 UTC

The cdrdao rpm in the PowerTools 6.2 requires the the gtk-- version that
ships with PowerTools 6.1 and balks at the 6.2 gtk--.  Seems like
cdrdao-1.1.3-1.i386.rpm should be happy to have gtk---1.0.3pre1-3.i386.rpm
instead of requiring gtk---1.0.3pre1-2.i386.rpm.  Was this an oversight or
is there a legitimate need for the version requirement to be hard set to
only that older gtk-- rpm?

Comment 1 Tim Powers 2000-05-26 13:04:59 UTC

It was definitely an oversight. When editing the "Requires:" line to read

	Requires: gtk-- >= 1.0.3

Are you able to rebuild it?

Tim

Comment 2 Tim Pepper 2000-06-11 02:01:36 UTC

Sorry it's taken me so long to get back on this.  Today I've finally edited the
requires line and had to scratch my head for a few minutes until I realised I
didn't have the gtk devel packages installed.  It does indeed rebuild.  I
haven't done any real testing or anything to make sure it works though...

Comment 3 Tim Powers 2000-06-19 21:30:28 UTC

OK. Just a heads up, the gtk-- package is going to be renamed to be gtkmm for
the nehxt release. I am closing this bug as "won't fix", if you have any more
problems with it reopen this bug.

Tim

Comment 4 Moritz Barsnick 2000-06-28 05:59:55 UTC

Furthermore, xcdrdao doesn't seem to be packaged in cdrdao-1.1.3-1.i386,
although that is actually _the_ component which is supposed to require gtk--.
(xcdrdao-1.1.4 [currently pre3] actually won't build at all without gtkmm >=
1.2.0. From then, find-requires will probably do.)

Actually, that's a bug, because there _is_ an applink in that package. (No,
xcdrdao isn't built in a separate package.)