According to that http://wiki.freeradius.org/project/Radiusclient that freeradius-client has superseded radiusclient-ng which as I understand it is no longer active. Shouldn't that package be updated to include freeradius-client instead?
I am adding the freeradius-client library which replaces the radiusclient-ng-utils. Would you agree to retire radiusclient-ng-utils (but keep the radiusclient-ng libraries as long as required), so that I can add the new freeradius-client-utils? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171129
Nikos, do you just want to take over maintenance of radiusclient-ng? I don't really have the time or interest in maintaining it. As long as Asterisk doesn't break I'm fine with you doing what needs to be done.
Ok, I've now applied for access. I'll not modify the libraries, but rather the utils. Does asterisk really require this package (can't it use freeradius-client?).
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
I have no idea if Asterisk can use another library, it's likely that it can't. Other than seeing if it compiles I can't test Asterisk's RADIUS client.