Bug 1171461 - gnurobbo should depend on gnurobbo-tronic
Summary: gnurobbo should depend on gnurobbo-tronic
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnurobbo
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jaromír Cápík
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updat...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-12-07 10:06 UTC by Štefan Gurský
Modified: 2016-02-01 02:00 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gnurobbo-0.66-6.20141028svn412.fc20
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-01-17 05:43:03 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1149423 0 medium CLOSED Review Request: gnurobbo - Port of an once famous game named Robbo 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 1157664 0 unspecified CLOSED delete copyrighted material or use alternatives 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1149423 1157664

Description Štefan Gurský 2014-12-07 10:06:12 UTC
Description of problem:
When running gnurobbo without gnurobbo-tronic installed, one gets an error:

Cannot find the default skin: /usr/share/gnurobbo/skins/tronic

Installing gnurobbo-tronic fixes it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Version     : 0.66
Release     : 4.20141028svn412.fc21
Architecture: x86_64

Comment 1 Raphael Groner 2014-12-11 17:48:49 UTC
(In reply to Štefan Gurský from comment #0)
> Cannot find the default skin: /usr/share/gnurobbo/skins/tronic

The other skins from upstream have legal issues, so I can only provide the (default) tronic skin, sorry.

The package gnurobbo is meant to be the base package, there should be more than just this one skin available (maybe at some further time at RPMFusion or somehow…). Package gnurobbo-skin is a subpackage but should be the first package to be installed, it has a dependency to gnurobbo (-base).

So unsure if I should rename to gnurobbo-base or the like. Suggests will be supported with dnf/rpm-4.12 but it's still in testing and not recommended.

Really, I do not want to close as WONTFIX but there are few other alternatives, please come with some ideas.

Comment 2 Matthias Runge 2014-12-12 07:49:45 UTC
this sounds to me, as gnurobbo is not useful in its current state.
Renaming the package won't fix this. Please consider to remove it from fedora.

Comment 3 Raphael Groner 2014-12-12 08:41:57 UTC
(In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #2)
> Please consider to remove it from fedora.

Well, the f21 package still sleeps in testing. So please give negative karma there. I can orphan rawhide, if you really wish. About F20 I have no clue how to handle it there as best.

Sad to read that my contributions (at least for gnurobbo) are without any positive feedback. :(

Comment 5 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2014-12-12 08:58:30 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 6 Raphael Groner 2014-12-12 08:59:54 UTC
Orphaned. Closing.

Comment 7 Štefan Gurský 2014-12-12 17:29:52 UTC
> The package gnurobbo is meant to be the base package, there should be more than just this one skin available

The package gnurobbo is unusable if no skin is installed. One skin is provided in gnurobbo-tronic. When gnurobbo-tronic is installed, it works fine. I think adding dependency would solve this just fine.

Or removing package altogether, of course, would work too.

Comment 8 Raphael Groner 2014-12-12 21:49:31 UTC
Moved to copr:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/raphgro/gnurobbo/

Comment 9 Jaromír Cápík 2015-01-02 15:24:06 UTC
I took the orphaned package and added dependency on the tronic skin so that the game works out of the box. If I understand correctly, the illegal content has been removed and the tronic skin is the only legal skin left. It needs to be made the default one then.

Comment 10 Jaromír Cápík 2015-01-02 18:33:19 UTC
I removed the set of original levels to avoid distributing non-free data and going to merge the modifications to f20/f21.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2015-01-02 19:17:57 UTC
gnurobbo-0.66-6.20141028svn412.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnurobbo-0.66-6.20141028svn412.fc20

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2015-01-02 19:18:03 UTC
gnurobbo-0.66-6.20141028svn412.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnurobbo-0.66-6.20141028svn412.fc21

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2015-01-03 19:04:12 UTC
Package gnurobbo-0.66-6.20141028svn412.fc21:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing gnurobbo-0.66-6.20141028svn412.fc21'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0068/gnurobbo-0.66-6.20141028svn412.fc21
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2015-01-17 05:43:03 UTC
gnurobbo-0.66-6.20141028svn412.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2015-01-17 05:46:07 UTC
gnurobbo-0.66-6.20141028svn412.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.