Bug 1171780 - 5.3.2.2 doesn't start evmserverd
Summary: 5.3.2.2 doesn't start evmserverd
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Appliance
Version: 5.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.4.0
Assignee: Brandon Dunne
QA Contact: Milan Falešník
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1171821
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-12-08 15:14 UTC by Sean Myers
Modified: 2015-06-16 12:46 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.4.0.0.11
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1171821 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-16 12:46:07 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1100 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE CFME 5.4.0 bug fixes, and enhancement update 2015-06-16 16:28:42 UTC

Description Sean Myers 2014-12-08 15:14:53 UTC
Description of problem:
evmserverd doesn't start on 5.3.2.2

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.3.2.2

How reproducible:
Fails on vmware and openstack templates, haven't tested rhev.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Clone an appliance
2. Try to start the evmserverd service

Actual results:
# service evmserverd start
Could not find linux_admin-0.9.1 in any of the sources
Run `bundle install` to install missing gems.

Expected results:
No errors

Additional info:
Running bundle install does indeed fix the problem. bundler output:

<snip>
Using io-extra (1.2.6) 
Using jbuilder (2.0.7) 
Using more_core_extensions (1.2.0) 
Installing linux_admin (0.9.1) 
Using little-plugger (1.1.3) 
Using log4r (1.1.8) 
Using logging (1.6.2) 
<snip>

Comment 1 Joe Vlcek 2014-12-08 15:31:40 UTC
cfme 5.3.2.2 should be pulling in linux_admin 0.9.3 not 0.9.1

It seems a Gemfile and/or Gemfile.lock needs to be updated:

https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/blob/master/vmdb/lockfiles/RHEL6.4/Gemfile.lock#L136

Will inquire with Developers as to what the correct course of action
should be.

Brandon Dunne, Did you work on the linux_admin upgrade in the manageiq base
or can you direct me to who did?

Comment 3 CFME Bot 2014-12-08 16:21:07 UTC
New commit detected on manageiq/master:
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/66e77ef99a232d5c8e144f7d2ee45c486861c7e1

commit 66e77ef99a232d5c8e144f7d2ee45c486861c7e1
Author:     Brandon Dunne <bdunne>
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 8 11:03:59 2014 -0500
Commit:     Brandon Dunne <bdunne>
CommitDate: Mon Dec 8 11:03:59 2014 -0500

    Remove RHEL 6.4 specific Gemfile.lock since it doesn't belong here
    
    [skip ci]
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171780

 vmdb/lockfiles/RHEL6.4/Gemfile.lock | 347 ------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 347 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 vmdb/lockfiles/RHEL6.4/Gemfile.lock

Comment 4 CFME Bot 2014-12-08 16:26:00 UTC
New commit detected on cfme/5.3.z:
https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/gitweb?p=cfme.git;a=commitdiff;h=3e5902ae945b9e93e4a1957f18b865cf166d59e3

commit 3e5902ae945b9e93e4a1957f18b865cf166d59e3
Author:     Brandon Dunne <bdunne>
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 8 11:03:59 2014 -0500
Commit:     Brandon Dunne <bdunne>
CommitDate: Mon Dec 8 11:22:06 2014 -0500

    Remove RHEL 6.4 specific Gemfile.lock since it doesn't belong here
    
    [skip ci]
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171780

 vmdb/lockfiles/RHEL6.4/Gemfile.lock | 320 ------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 320 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 vmdb/lockfiles/RHEL6.4/Gemfile.lock

Comment 6 Milan Falešník 2015-03-05 14:49:48 UTC
Verified in 5.4.0.0.10

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2015-06-16 12:46:07 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1100.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.