Bug 117332 – calling free on random pointer value

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 117332 - calling free on random pointer value

Summary:	calling free on random pointer value

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	prelink (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2004-03-02 16:33 EST by d.binderman
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:	0.3.1-1
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-03-04 12:37:48 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHBA-2004:386	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	Updated prelink package	2004-09-02 00:00:00 EDT

Groups: None (edit)

Description d.binderman 2004-03-02 16:33:12 EST

Description of problem:

I just tried to compile Core2 Test1 package prelink-0.3.0-20

The compiler said

prelink.c(348): remark #592: variable "data" is used before its value
is set

The source code is

         free (data.d_buf);

Calling free on uninit local variable data is deeply unwise.  Suggest init
data.d_buf before first use.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2004-03-02 17:20:30 EST

Thanks, fixed in my tree.  Bigger bug is that GCC doesn't warn about
this (only when the variable is not aggregate).  ++todo.

Comment 2 Jay Turner 2004-09-02 01:19:47 EDT

An errata has been issued which should help the problem 
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being 
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, 
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report 
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-386.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.