Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1173723 - content-override does not produce an error when --label is missing
Summary: content-override does not produce an error when --label is missing
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Hammer
Version: Nightly
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Christine Fouant
QA Contact: jcallaha
URL: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1188305
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-12-12 18:50 UTC by jcallaha
Modified: 2017-02-23 20:43 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-08-12 05:20:45 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Foreman Issue Tracker 8892 0 None None None 2016-04-22 16:18:28 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2015:1592 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: Red Hat Satellite 6.1.1 on RHEL 6 2015-08-12 09:04:35 UTC

Description jcallaha 2014-12-12 18:50:17 UTC 
Description of problem: 
when running activation-key content-override, you must include the label of the product being overridden. However, a user can currently run content-override without passing --label. Of course, no change is made.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Nightly


How reproducible:
always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. create an activation key and add a subscription
2. run hammer -u admin -p **** activation-key content-override --id=<activation key id> --organization-id=<organization id>
3. view results


Actual results:
Command runs and returns "Updated content override"


Expected results:
An error should be returned informing the user that a product label is needed.


Additional info:
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2014-12-12 19:04:28 UTC 
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.
Comment 3 Christine Fouant 2015-01-09 18:23:36 UTC 
Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/8892 from this bug
Comment 4 Christine Fouant 2015-02-11 15:41:57 UTC 
*** Bug 1187750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2015-02-25 17:04:41 UTC 
Moving to POST since upstream bug http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/8892 has been closed
-------------
Christine Fouant
Applied in changeset commit:katello|bc66876163e0cd5f6ccaaaf7223f990147aea9d5.
Comment 8 Tazim Kolhar 2015-03-09 08:57:55 UTC 
FAILEDQA :

# rpm -qa | grep foreman
foreman-1.7.2.8-1.el6_6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_discovery-0.0.1.2-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-compute-1.7.2.8-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_docker-1.2.0.2-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_hooks-0.3.7-2.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman-tasks-0.6.12.1-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-proxy-1.7.2.3-1.el6_6sat.noarch
qe-sat6-rhel66.usersys.redhat.com-foreman-client-1.0-1.noarch
qe-sat6-rhel66.usersys.redhat.com-foreman-proxy-client-1.0-1.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_bootdisk-0.1.2.5-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-vmware-1.7.2.8-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-libvirt-1.7.2.8-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_abrt-0.0.5-2.el6_6sat.noarch
qe-sat6-rhel66.usersys.redhat.com-foreman-proxy-1.0-2.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman-0.1.4.6-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-selinux-1.7.2.8-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-debug-1.7.2.8-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-gce-1.7.2.8-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman-redhat_access-0.0.8-2.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_discovery-2.0.0.5-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_gutterball-0.0.1.9-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-postgresql-1.7.2.8-1.el6_6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_tasks-0.0.3.3-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-ovirt-1.7.2.8-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_bootdisk-4.0.2.8-1.el6_6sat.noarch

 hammer -u admin -p changeme activation-key content-override --id 75 --organization 1 --content-label 'Busybox' --value 0
Could not update content override:
  Invalid content label: Busybox
Comment 9 Christine Fouant 2015-03-09 15:24:18 UTC 
This looks like the bug wasn't tested correctly. Moving back to ON_QA.
Comment 10 jcallaha 2015-03-09 15:32:53 UTC 
Verified in Satellite 6.1.0 snap 5.

Version tested:
RHEL 66
RHEL 7


# hammer -u admin -p **** activation-key content-override --content-label=rhel-7-server-satellite-6.0-rpms --value=0 --id=3 --organization-id=12
Updated content override
Comment 11 Bryan Kearney 2015-08-11 13:20:50 UTC 
This bug is slated to be released with Satellite 6.1.
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-08-12 05:20:45 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1592
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.