Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1174338

Summary:	[Doc Bug Fix] Add note - if JMS bridge is configured with quality-of-server ONCE_AND_ONLY_ONCE then shutdown server without JMS bridge deployment first
Product:	[JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6	Reporter:	Miroslav Novak <mnovak>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	Scott Mumford <smumford>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Miroslav Novak <mnovak>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.4.0	CC:	majoshi, nchaudha, smumford
Target Milestone:	CR3	Keywords:	Documentation, EasyFix, Triaged
Target Release:	EAP 6.4.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-04-17 05:47:55 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Miroslav Novak 2014-12-15 16:34:38 UTC

Document URL: 

http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/6.3/html/Administration_and_Configuration_Guide/Configuring_HornetQ_JMS_Bridge.html

Section Number and Name: 
⁠
20.8.6. Configuring JMS Bridge

Describe the issue: 

Add note - if server with deployed JMS bridge is configured with quality-of-server ONCE_AND_ONLY_ONCE and is going to be shutdown then shutdown server without JMS bridge first unexpected exceptions can occur in server.log.

Comment 3 Miroslav Novak 2015-02-23 08:11:17 UTC

Hi Scott,

sorry, I provided bad description. Server with deployed JMS bridge should be shut downed first. Can you modify the note to something like:

"When shutting down a server that has a deployed JMS bridge with quality-of-service attribute set to ONCE_AND_ONLY_ONCE, shut the server down with the JMS bridge first to avoid unexpected exceptions."

Thanks,
Mirek

Comment 4 Scott Mumford 2015-02-23 23:23:13 UTC

No problem Miroslav.

I've swapped out the paragraph and used your newest suggestion.

The change will be available for review after the next rebuild.

Comment 6 Miroslav Novak 2015-03-18 09:02:51 UTC

Thanks to all! Setting as verified.