Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1174360

Summary: Guidied Rule Editor: Unmarshalling of CompositeFieldConstraints does not work correctly
Product: [Retired] JBoss BRMS Platform 6 Reporter: Amana <ajuricic>
Component: Business CentralAssignee: manstis
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Jiri Locker <jlocker>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.0.3CC: jeremy.davis, kverlaen, manstis
Target Milestone: ER4   
Target Release: 6.1.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-27 20:05:49 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
UnDistortedRule.png
none
UndistoredRule_Source.png
none
DistortedRule.png
none
DistortedRule_Source.png none

Description Amana 2014-12-15 17:38:58 UTC
### Description of problem:

After creating a rule which has three 'all of the following' condition within one 'any of the following' condition (please see UnDistortedRule.png), the first part of the rule that contains 'all of the following' condition is getting distorted (see DistortedRule.png).

Note that in "DistortedRule.png", it is missing the first 'all of the following' and one of the conditions (homePhones matches ...). The source code has already changed after saving and re-opening it.


### Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

6.0.3 GA
6.0.3 + Roll UP Patch#1
BRMS 6.1.0 ER2


### How reproducible:

Always


### Steps to Reproduce:
1)	Create an “any of the following” condition
2)	Add more than one “all of the following” conditions each with multiple conditions under the “any of the following” condition
3)	Save and close.


### Actual results:

When you open up the rule again, the “all of the following” and one of the conditions under that seem to disappear from the first condition in the list.


###Expected results:

it should not disappear


### Additional info:

Note that we have tested it on

6.0.3 GA
6.0.3 + Roll UP Patch#1
BRMS 6.1.0 ER2

Comment 1 Amana 2014-12-15 17:39:30 UTC
Created attachment 969201 [details]
UnDistortedRule.png

Comment 2 Amana 2014-12-15 17:39:53 UTC
Created attachment 969202 [details]
UndistoredRule_Source.png

Comment 4 Amana 2014-12-15 17:40:22 UTC
Created attachment 969203 [details]
DistortedRule.png

Comment 5 Amana 2014-12-15 17:40:45 UTC
Created attachment 969204 [details]
DistortedRule_Source.png

Comment 7 Jeremy Davis 2015-04-20 15:28:01 UTC
Did this make it into 6.1?