Bug 117675 - Typo in swap partition increase text - refers to 2.4 kernel
Typo in swap partition increase text - refers to 2.4 kernel
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda-help (Show other bugs)
rawhide
i386 Linux
medium Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeremy Katz
Mike McLean
: StringChange
Depends On:
Blocks: FC2Blocker
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-03-06 18:44 EST by David Costanzo
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-05-06 17:02:53 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description David Costanzo 2004-03-06 18:44:01 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6)
Gecko/20040113

Description of problem:
I recently upgraded a RH 9 machine to Fedora Core 2 Test 1.  During
the process, the installation program told me that I had no swap
partition and that I needed one because *2.4* [my emphasis] kernels
require more swap space than older kernels.  (I forget the exact
message and I can't reproduce, now that my machine is upgraded).

The main reason that I upgraded to Fedora Core 2 was was for the 2.6
kernel, so I found this reference to the 2.4 kernel confusing, since
it implies that Fedora 2 uses a 2.4 kernel, which isn't true.  In my
opinion, it would be better to say that the *2.6* kernel requires more
swap than older kernels.

I ran the en-US install.  The same typo may exist in other localizations.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RH 9
2. Upgrade to Fedora Core 2, Test 1
3.


Additional info:

I can't remember if my machine had a swap partition before it was
upgraded.  It was running RH 9, which is a 2.4 kernel, which makes me
think that it must have had one.  (Which is another reason I found the
text of the message confusing.)  Maybe I did have a swap partition and
it just wasn't big enough.

Anyway, I don't know I triggered the increase-your-swap-partition-size
message, so I don't know enough to give a good repro.  Still, this bug
should be findable by looking over the text in the en-US localization.
Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2004-05-06 17:02:53 EDT
We don't show this screen anymore

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.