RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1177676 - [RFE] Backport v218 systemctl status" now shows the suggested enablement state
Summary: [RFE] Backport v218 systemctl status" now shows the suggested enablement state
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: systemd
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: systemd-maint
QA Contact: Branislav Blaškovič
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-12-29 19:45 UTC by Pat Riehecky
Modified: 2015-11-19 15:02 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: systemd-219-1.el7
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-19 15:02:32 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:2092 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE systemd bug fix and enhancement update 2015-11-19 12:13:57 UTC

Description Pat Riehecky 2014-12-29 19:45:43 UTC
Description of problem:
CHANGES WITH systemd v218

        * "systemctl status" now shows the suggested enablement state
          for a unit, as declared in the (usually vendor-supplied)
          system preset files.

This additional informational output from systemctl status seems like it would be useful for many system admins

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 	systemd-208-11.el7_0.5


How reproducible: Feature Request from v218

Comment 4 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-04-21 13:51:12 UTC
This should be now fixed with the rebase.

Comment 6 Branislav Blaškovič 2015-09-01 13:03:57 UTC
Default vendor preset is now visible:

:: [ 08:58:49 ] :: Package versions:
:: [ 08:58:49 ] ::   systemd-219-11.el7.x86_64

:: [  BEGIN   ] :: Running 'systemctl status auditd -l'
● auditd.service - Security Auditing Service
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/auditd.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: active (running) since Tue 2015-09-01 08:41:22 EDT; 17min ago
 Main PID: 616 (auditd)
   CGroup: /system.slice/auditd.service
           └─616 /sbin/auditd -n
...
:: [   PASS   ] :: Command 'systemctl status auditd -l' (Expected 0, got 0)
:: [   PASS   ] :: File '/var/tmp/tmp.fqkvf81lt7' should contain 'vendor preset: enabled'

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 15:02:32 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2092.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.