Bug 118139 – (SCSI DC395X 2.4ONLY)Cant install kernel 2.6.3 no module dc 359x

Bug 118139 - (SCSI DC395X 2.4ONLY)Cant install kernel 2.6.3 no module dc 359x

Summary:	(SCSI DC395X 2.4ONLY)Cant install kernel 2.6.3 no module dc 359x

Status:	CLOSED UPSTREAM

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	kernel (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	i686 Linux

Priority	high Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Dave Jones
QA Contact:	Brian Brock
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2004-03-12 08:11 EST by Marcus Hufgard
Modified:	2015-01-04 17:04 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-12-08 19:18:47 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Marcus Hufgard 2004-03-12 08:11:29 EST

Hi!

If i want to install the actuall kernel-rpm with rpm -i --force
kernel-2.6.3-2.1.253.i686.rpm there comes the error message:

No module dc395x found for kernel 2.6.3-2.1.253, aborting.
mkinitrd failed
Fehler: %post(kernel-2.6.3-2.1.253) scriptlet failed, exit status 0

Comment 1 Warren Togami 2004-04-18 23:33:36 EDT

Why --force?  You must be trying to install it onto an old
distribution that is unsupported.  It probably would not work because
modutils and initscripts would probably have trouble with it.

# CONFIG_SCSI_DC395x is not set
The latest FC development kernel has this module disabled.  I am
guessing that it worked in 2.4.x kernel but it is either known to be
broken or completely untested in 2.6.  I do not see much complaining
about it on LKML in the last 6 months, so its status is unknown to me.

You may want to ask upstream about its status.

Comment 2 Dave Jones 2004-12-08 19:18:47 EST

this needs fixing upstream. it's been broken for some time, and it appears
no-one cares about fixing it.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.