Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 118183 - binutils assertion hit on ppc64
binutils assertion hit on ppc64
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: binutils (Show other bugs)
rawhide
powerpc Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jakub Jelinek
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2004-03-12 16:46 EST by Elliot Lee
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-03-15 13:20:46 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Elliot Lee 2004-03-12 16:46:09 EST 
Rebuilding the 'parted' package on ppc64 fails. gcc complains a bunch,
and then we see lines such as:

/usr/bin/ld: BFD 2.14.90.0.8 20040114 assertion fail
../../bfd/elflink.c:2275

See ~sopwith/rebuild/logs/parted*ppc64*.log for the whole spiel.
Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2004-03-15 12:34:55 EST 
This is primarily bug on parted's part.  -Wl,-static is terribly wrong
and so is -Wl,-lc.  Instead of -Wl,-static it should pass -static
to the compiler, gcc links things different for -static and !-static.
If -Wl,-static is used, this is hidden to the compiler driver and bad
things happen.  And why that -Wl,-lc in there?  gcc driver puts -lc
by default at the right place on the link line...
Comment 2 Elliot Lee 2004-03-15 13:20:46 EST 
Fixing, thanks.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.