Bug 1182548 - Review Request: gnome-taquin - Sliding-block puzzle game
Summary: Review Request: gnome-taquin - Sliding-block puzzle game
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Haïkel Guémar
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-01-15 12:29 UTC by Yanko Kaneti
Modified: 2015-01-21 13:35 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-01-21 13:35:26 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
karlthered: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Yanko Kaneti 2015-01-15 12:29:59 UTC
Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/gnome-taquin/gnome-taquin.spec
SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/gnome-taquin/gnome-taquin-3.15.3-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description: Taquin is a computer version of the 15-puzzle and other sliding puzzles. The object of Taquin is to move tiles so that they reach their places, 
either indicated with numbers, or with parts of a great image.
Fedora Account System Username: yaneti

Comment 1 Haïkel Guémar 2015-01-18 17:01:06 UTC
According dependencies, it will only build on rawhide onwards, so using %license macro without fallback is ok.

I hereby approve this package into Fedora Packages Collection, since it complies with Fedora
guidelines. Please submit a SCM request.



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 4 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/haikel/1182548-gnome-
     taquin/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
     be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners:
     /usr/share/icons/HighContrast/24x24/apps,
     /usr/share/icons/HighContrast/256x256, /usr/share/help,
     /usr/share/icons/HighContrast/32x32, /usr/share/icons/HighContrast/22x22,
     /usr/share/icons/HighContrast/16x16/apps,
     /usr/share/icons/HighContrast/32x32/apps, /usr/share/icons/HighContrast,
     /usr/share/icons/HighContrast/48x48,
     /usr/share/icons/HighContrast/22x22/apps,
     /usr/share/icons/HighContrast/16x16,
     /usr/share/icons/HighContrast/48x48/apps, /usr/share/help/C,
     /usr/share/icons/HighContrast/256x256/apps,
     /usr/share/icons/HighContrast/24x24
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: glib-compile-schemas is run in %postun and %posttrans if package has
     *.gschema.xml files.
     Note: gschema file(s) in gnome-taquin
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
     contains icons.
     Note: icons in gnome-taquin
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
     file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
     Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 13424640 bytes in /usr/share gnome-
     taquin-3.15.3-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm:13424640
     See:
     http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Guidelines
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: gnome-taquin-3.15.3-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
          gnome-taquin-3.15.3-1.fc22.src.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
]0;<mock-chroot><mock-chroot>[root@zangetsu /]# rpmlint gnome-taquin
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
]0;<mock-chroot><mock-chroot>[root@zangetsu /]# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
gnome-taquin (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /bin/sh
    libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libcairo-gobject.so.2()(64bit)
    libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
    libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    librsvg-2.so.2()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
gnome-taquin:
    appdata()
    appdata(gnome-taquin.appdata.xml)
    application()
    application(gnome-taquin.desktop)
    gnome-taquin
    gnome-taquin(x86-64)



Source checksums
----------------
http://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-taquin/3.15/gnome-taquin-3.15.3.tar.xz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 50fbd87237c55a61c06d247f4b1d5dd6f946a1b52f42fc5f824889e87583a987
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 50fbd87237c55a61c06d247f4b1d5dd6f946a1b52f42fc5f824889e87583a987

Comment 2 Yanko Kaneti 2015-01-18 17:58:04 UTC
Thanks for the review.
I'll cosider adding a -data noarch subpackage after the import.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: gnome-taquin
Short Description: Sliding-block puzzle game
Owners: yaneti gnome-sig
Branches: 
InitialCC:

Comment 3 Yanko Kaneti 2015-01-18 18:21:23 UTC
Filed an upstream report wrt the cats images sizes, which imho seem excessive.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743137

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2015-01-18 22:37:08 UTC
gnome-sig is not in the packager group.

Comment 5 Yanko Kaneti 2015-01-19 07:48:45 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: gnome-taquin
Short Description: Sliding-block puzzle game
Owners: yaneti group::gnome-sig
Branches: 
InitialCC:

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2015-01-20 14:18:26 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Yanko Kaneti 2015-01-21 13:35:26 UTC
Imported and built for rawhide.
Thanks all.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.