Bug 1183191 - Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) library
Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1480794
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 1183826 1185099
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-01-17 00:26 UTC by Jon Ludlam
Modified: 2017-08-11 22:03 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-11 22:03:34 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jon Ludlam 2015-01-17 00:26:01 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf-0.7-1.fc21.src.rpm
Description:
CUDF (for Common Upgradeability Description Format) is a format for describing
upgrade scenarios in package-based Free and Open Source Software distribution.

libCUDF is a library to manipulate so called CUDF documents. A CUDF document
describe an upgrade problem, as faced by package managers in popular
package-based GNU/Linux distributions.

Fedora Account System Username: jonludlam

Comment 1 Jon Ludlam 2015-01-17 00:26:48 UTC
koji link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8647847

Comment 2 Jon Ludlam 2015-01-21 17:11:50 UTC
I noticed that I have accidentally included the .o files into the main package. However, on removing these, I now have a hard error: 

ocaml-cudf.x86_64: E: no-binary

I'm not convinced this is a real error though - the package contents are now:

/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/META
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf.cma
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_822_lexer.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_822_parser.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_c.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_checker.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_conf.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_parser.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_printer.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_type_lexer.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_type_parser.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_types.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_types_pp.cmi
/usr/share/doc/ocaml-cudf
/usr/share/doc/ocaml-cudf/README

and I'm not sure that these are really noarch material.

Comment 3 Jon Ludlam 2015-01-21 17:15:33 UTC
Updated SRPM URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf-0.7-2.fc21.src.rpm
Updated SPEC URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf.spec

Comment 4 Richard W.M. Jones 2015-01-23 18:14:47 UTC
You can probably ignore the "error"
ocaml-cudf.x86_64: E: no-binary
rpmlint has some problems with OCaml packages, although it has
improved over time.

The spec file looks reasonable to me.

Comment 5 Jon Ludlam 2015-02-24 17:51:21 UTC
Updated to add in a license file (COPYING) and to fix a missing {?_isa} macro in the devel package Requires line.

Spec URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf-0.7-3.fc21.src.rpm

Comment 6 Upstream Release Monitoring 2015-10-21 23:08:42 UTC
jonludlam's scratch build of ocaml-cudf-0.8-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11536796

Comment 7 Jon Ludlam 2015-10-21 23:36:23 UTC
New upstream release.

Spec URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf-0.8-1.fc23.src.rpm

Comment 8 Ben Rosser 2017-08-11 22:03:34 UTC
Jon has been absent since 2015 and nonresponsive on other tickets; therefore I'm marking this as a dead review and resubmitting it here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1480794 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.