Bug 1183356 - Update python-catkin_pkg Requires for python-dateutil
Summary: Update python-catkin_pkg Requires for python-dateutil
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-catkin_pkg
Version: 22
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/piper...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1126521
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-01-18 21:04 UTC by Pete Travis
Modified: 2015-03-12 15:15 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-12 15:15:59 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Pete Travis 2015-01-18 21:04:44 UTC
python-dateutil will be updated to version 2.x and there may be changes that affect this package.  

If python-catkin_pkg will work with the newer python-dateutil, you can safely close this bug.  If python-catkin_pkg really does require python-dateutil 1.5, please use Requires: python-dateutil15 for Fedora versions of the package until it can be updated.

Comment 1 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2015-01-19 12:02:57 UTC
Thanks for filing the bug report, Pete. I'll check and make the required changes. 

Warm regards,
Ankur

Comment 2 Pete Travis 2015-02-13 18:46:50 UTC
I see one use here; it uses dateutil.parser.parse() to format a date string. This shouldn't have changed, afaik.

There's also this:
   stdeb.cfg:Depends3: python3-dateutil, python3-docutils

Upstream cites python3-dateutil as a viable requirement for the python3 version of the package built from the same sources; python3-dateutil must be >=2.0. I think we're good here.

Comment 3 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 17:07:09 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22

Comment 4 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2015-03-12 15:15:59 UTC
Seems OK to me too. It only seems to use dateutil.parser here. Should be fine. Closing.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.