It was reported [1] that Privoxy 3.0.23 contains fixes for the following security issues: - Fixed a DoS issue in case of client requests with incorrect chunk-encoded body. When compiled with assertions enabled (the default) they could previously cause Privoxy to abort(). Reported by Matthew Daley. http://ijbswa.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ijbswa/current/jcc.c?r1=1.433&r2=1.434 - Fixed multiple segmentation faults and memory leaks in the pcrs code. This fix also increases the chances that an invalid pcrs command is rejected as such. Previously some invalid commands would be loaded without error. Note that Privoxy's pcrs sources (action and filter files) are considered trustworthy input and should not be writable by untrusted third-parties. http://ijbswa.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ijbswa/current/pcrs.c?r1=1.46&r2=1.47 - Fixed an 'invalid read' bug which could at least theoretically cause Privoxy to crash. http://ijbswa.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ijbswa/current/parsers.c?r1=1.297&r2=1.298 [1]: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/259
Created privoxy tracking bugs for this issue: Affects: fedora-all [bug 1185925] Affects: epel-all [bug 1185926]
CVE assignments per http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/285: > - Fixed a DoS issue in case of client requests with incorrect > chunk-encoded body. When compiled with assertions enabled > (the default) they could previously cause Privoxy to abort(). > Reported by Matthew Daley. > > http://ijbswa.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ijbswa/current/jcc.c?r1=1.433&r2=1. > 434 CVE-2015-1380 > > - Fixed multiple segmentation faults and memory leaks in the > pcrs code. This fix also increases the chances that an invalid > pcrs command is rejected as such. Previously some invalid commands > would be loaded without error. Note that Privoxy's pcrs sources > (action and filter files) are considered trustworthy input and > should not be writable by untrusted third-parties. > > http://ijbswa.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ijbswa/current/pcrs.c?r1=1.46&r2=1. > 47 CVE-2015-1381 > > - Fixed an 'invalid read' bug which could at least theoretically > cause Privoxy to crash. > > http://ijbswa.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ijbswa/current/parsers.c?r1=1. > 297&r2=1.298 CVE-2015-1382
CVE-2015-1381 has been split to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1203246 CVE-2015-1382 has been split to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1203248