Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 118651 - bad wnn home dir, /etc/services munging
bad wnn home dir, /etc/services munging
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: FreeWnn (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jens Petersen
Bill Huang
: i18n
Depends On:
Blocks: FC2Blocker
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2004-03-18 11:41 EST by Bill Nottingham
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:43 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 1:1.10pl020-2
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-08-05 22:16:37 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Bill Nottingham 2004-03-18 11:41:51 EST
1) you shouldn't touch /etc/services... the services file is in setup
and can be modified there if needed.
2) wnn's home dir shouldn't be in /home
3) wnn is created in both FreeWnn-common and FreeWnn %post - pick one. :)
Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2004-03-18 22:31:33 EST
Thanks, fixing in next build.
Comment 2 Warren Togami 2004-04-10 22:37:32 EDT
Has this been fixed?
Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2004-04-12 00:41:47 EDT
Should be in 1:1.10pl020-1.
Comment 4 Seth Vidal 2004-05-07 12:06:29 EDT
Looking in %preinstall of 1.11-42.1 I'm seeing
preinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
# Do only for the first install
if [ "$1" = 1 ] ; then
  # Add the wnn4 lines to /etc/services
  if (grep '22273/tcp' /etc/services >/dev/null); then
    cat <<'_EOD2_' >>/etc/services
# start of wnn4 services
wnn4              22273/tcp
# end of wnn4 services

seems like services is still being modified.
and the user account is being created in both FreeWnn and FreeWnn-common

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2004-05-07 12:22:55 EDT
Unfortunately FreeWnn-1.10pl020 segfaults on hammer at least
and possibly another arch too iirc.
Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2004-05-10 02:57:15 EDT
In comment 5, I meant the 1.10pl020 build segfaults on x86_64.
Comment 7 Jens Petersen 2004-07-05 07:33:33 EDT
Sopwith built it recently.  

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.