Spec URL: https://tradej.fedorapeople.org/reviews/daps/devassistant-dap-git/0/devassistant-dap-git.spec SRPM URL: https://tradej.fedorapeople.org/reviews/daps/devassistant-dap-git/0/devassistant-dap-git-0.10.0dev-4.fc21.src.rpm Description: Git snippet, allowing to initialize a git repo and commit everything. Fedora Account System Username: tradej
Spec URL: https://tradej.fedorapeople.org/reviews/daps/devassistant-dap-git/1/devassistant-dap-git.spec SRPM URL: https://tradej.fedorapeople.org/reviews/daps/devassistant-dap-git/1/devassistant-dap-git-0.10.0dev-5.fc21.src.rpm Description: Git snippet, allowing to initialize a git repo and commit everything.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Issues ====== [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines Note: This is just the consequence of the next point [!]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. rpmlint: devassistant-dap-git.src:38: W: macro-in-%changelog %license Use %%license ore drop pre-git changelog entries when importing to git. ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines Note: See other issues for explanation. [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [!]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [-]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [-]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: devassistant-dap-git-0.10.0dev-5.fc22.noarch.rpm devassistant-dap-git-0.10.0dev-5.fc22.src.rpm devassistant-dap-git.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repo -> rope, rep, reps devassistant-dap-git.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repo -> rope, rep, reps devassistant-dap-git.src:38: W: macro-in-%changelog %license 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. All spelling-errors are fine. Requires -------- devassistant-dap-git (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): devassistant-ui Provides -------- devassistant-dap-git: devassistant-dap-git Source checksums ---------------- https://dapi.devassistant.org/download/git-0.10.0dev.dap : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 885bf524a0a8b318cf0cfc1adb0615b879e098bfc001f81669101ec38672cec0 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 885bf524a0a8b318cf0cfc1adb0615b879e098bfc001f81669101ec38672cec0 Package NOT APPROVED.
Spec URL: https://tradej.fedorapeople.org/reviews/daps/devassistant-dap-git/2/devassistant-dap-git.spec SRPM URL: https://tradej.fedorapeople.org/reviews/daps/devassistant-dap-git/2/devassistant-dap-git-0.10.0dev-6.fc21.src.rpm Description: Git snippet, allowing to initialize a git repo and commit everything.
Fixed. APPROVED.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: devassistant-dap-git Short Description: Git snippet to be used from other assistants Upstream URL: https://github.com/devassistant/dap-git Owners: bkabrda Branches: InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).