Bug 1189621 - [RFE][ceilometer]: ability to set a severity level on the alarm in ceilometer
Summary: [RFE][ceilometer]: ability to set a severity level on the alarm in ceilometer
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-ceilometer
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
medium
Target Milestone: Upstream M2
: 7.0 (Kilo)
Assignee: Eoghan Glynn
QA Contact: Yurii Prokulevych
URL: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceil...
Whiteboard: upstream_milestone_kilo-2 upstream_de...
Depends On: 1232163
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-02-05 14:13 UTC by RHOS Integration
Modified: 2015-08-05 13:20 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: openstack-ceilometer-2015.1.0-2.el7ost
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-08-05 13:20:19 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Launchpad 1452264 0 None None None Never
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2015:1548 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform Enhancement Advisory 2015-08-05 17:07:06 UTC

Description RHOS Integration 2015-02-05 14:13:57 UTC 
Cloned from launchpad blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/ceilometer-alarm-level.

Description:

Currently alarms in ceilometer have no concept of an importance level. This makes it hard from auditing stand point to figure out which alarm is a low priority vs critical. The goal of this blueprint is to incorporate the alarm_level into the alarm object so we can set a criticality. 

Specification URL (additional information):

https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer-specs/blob/master/specs/kilo/ceilometer-alarm-level.rst
Comment 2 Yurii Prokulevych 2015-04-16 08:23:05 UTC 
Eoghan,
could you please review the above test plan and provide your comments?

Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Yurii
Comment 6 Yurii Prokulevych 2015-07-17 15:39:58 UTC 
Verified according test plan.
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2015-08-05 13:20:19 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015:1548
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.