Spec URL: http://www.zkusebnidomena.czweb.org/rpms/mycila-licenses/mycila-licenses.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zkusebnidomena.czweb.org/rpms/mycila-licenses/mycila-licenses-1-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: Licenses used in Mycila projects. It is optional build dependency of elasticsearch.
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8939074 $ rpmlint -i -v * mycila-licenses.src: I: checking mycila-licenses.src: E: description-line-too-long C DO NOT USE THIS PROJECT OUT OF MYCILA PARENT POM: This is an internal Mycila JAR ! Your description lines must not exceed 80 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. mycila-licenses.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/mycila/licenses (timeout 10 seconds) mycila-licenses.src:2: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 1) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. mycila-licenses.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/mycila/licenses/archive/licenses-1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) mycila-licenses.noarch: I: checking mycila-licenses.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C DO NOT USE THIS PROJECT OUT OF MYCILA PARENT POM: This is an internal Mycila JAR ! Your description lines must not exceed 80 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. mycila-licenses.noarch: I: checking-url https://github.com/mycila/licenses (timeout 10 seconds) mycila-licenses.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/mycila-licenses/README.md The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. mycila-licenses.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mycila-licenses/README.md This script has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or modification on a non-Unix system. It will prevent its execution. mycila-licenses.spec: I: checking mycila-licenses.spec:2: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 1) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. mycila-licenses.spec: I: checking-url https://github.com/mycila/licenses/archive/licenses-1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings. Please replace the tabs with spaces in your spec. The file README.md needs also to be fixed with dos2unix and removed the executable bit from. The description line needs to be wrapped at 80 characters.
Spec URL: http://www.zkusebnidomena.czweb.org/rpms/mycila-licenses/v2/mycila-licenses.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zkusebnidomena.czweb.org/rpms/mycila-licenses/v2/mycila-licenses-1-1.fc23.src.rpm
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8965448 $ rpmlint -i -v * mycila-licenses.noarch: I: checking mycila-licenses.noarch: I: checking-url https://github.com/mycila/licenses (timeout 10 seconds) mycila-licenses.src: I: checking mycila-licenses.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/mycila/licenses (timeout 10 seconds) mycila-licenses.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/mycila/licenses/archive/licenses-1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) mycila-licenses.spec: I: checking mycila-licenses.spec: I: checking-url https://github.com/mycila/licenses/archive/licenses-1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. No issues. Checksums differ: $ sha256sum * 62d75025b4c4cb72c7a9f27288c7d16ddbad3d3a08117ce1258effcbbae5d0e8 licenses-1-orig.tar.gz 5dca22d33cafe3bdc9e739e7a6aab80f6889fe6cddc4928cf4c3bc1005c8157b licenses-1.tar.gz If you use an URL for the tarball, you must also use it to fetch the sources. This is the content of your tarball: $ tar xvzf licenses-1.tar.gzlicenses-1/ licenses-1/.gitignore licenses-1/README.md licenses-1/pom.xml licenses-1/src/ licenses-1/src/main/ licenses-1/src/main/resources/ licenses-1/src/main/resources/com/ licenses-1/src/main/resources/com/mycila/ licenses-1/src/main/resources/com/mycila/licenses/ licenses-1/src/main/resources/com/mycila/licenses/APACHE-2 licenses-1/src/main/resources/com/mycila/licenses/MIT The original tarball contains an extra directory licenses-licenses-1: $ tar xvzf licenses-1-orig.tar.gz licenses-licenses-1/ licenses-licenses-1/.gitignore licenses-licenses-1/README.md licenses-licenses-1/pom.xml licenses-licenses-1/src/ licenses-licenses-1/src/main/ licenses-licenses-1/src/main/resources/ licenses-licenses-1/src/main/resources/com/ licenses-licenses-1/src/main/resources/com/mycila/ licenses-licenses-1/src/main/resources/com/mycila/licenses/ licenses-licenses-1/src/main/resources/com/mycila/licenses/APACHE-2 licenses-licenses-1/src/main/resources/com/mycila/licenses/MIT You are not allowed to change the structure. Use the tarball as is. To solve the problem, you can add an extra command "cd licenses-licenses-1" in %prep after unpacking the tarball.
I am sorry, I thought, they are same Spec URL: http://www.zkusebnidomena.czweb.org/rpms/mycila-licenses/v3/mycila-licenses.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zkusebnidomena.czweb.org/rpms/mycila-licenses/v3/mycila-licenses-1-1.fc23.src.rpm
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8970826 $ rpmlint -i -v *mycila-licenses.noarch: I: checking mycila-licenses.noarch: I: checking-url https://github.com/mycila/licenses (timeout 10 seconds) mycila-licenses.src: I: checking mycila-licenses.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/mycila/licenses (timeout 10 seconds) mycila-licenses.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/mycila/licenses/archive/licenses-1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) mycila-licenses.spec: I: checking mycila-licenses.spec: I: checking-url https://github.com/mycila/licenses/archive/licenses-1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- key: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ASL 2.0 [.] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %license. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ sha256sum * 62d75025b4c4cb72c7a9f27288c7d16ddbad3d3a08117ce1258effcbbae5d0e8 licenses-1.tar.gz 62d75025b4c4cb72c7a9f27288c7d16ddbad3d3a08117ce1258effcbbae5d0e8 licenses-1.tar.gz.orig [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. It is often not that useful to generate %files from a automatically created list. This makes it more difficult to figure out whether directory ownerships are OK. A static file list which matches the packaging guidelines would be: %files %doc README.md %{_docdir}/mycila-licenses %{_datadir}/java/mycila-licenses/licenses.jar %{_datadir}/maven-metadata/mycila-licenses.xml %{_datadir}/maven-poms/mycila-licenses/licenses.pom However, the ownerships are OK due to jpackages-utils as runtime requirement. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations) [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [.] MUST: Development files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} [.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [.] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See Koji build above (which uses Mock anyway). [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [.] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [.] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [.] SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts. If it doesn't, work with upstream to add them where they make sense. ---------------- PACKAGE APPROVED ----------------
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mycila-licenses Short Description: Licenses used in Mycila projects. Upstream URL: https://github.com/mycila/licenses Owners: zzambers jvanek Branches: f22 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).