Bug 1190870
| Summary: | ceph is not built with yasm | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) <kdreyer> |
| Component: | Build | Assignee: | Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) <kdreyer> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | ceph-qa-bugs <ceph-qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 1.2.2 | CC: | branto, dmick |
| Target Milestone: | pre-dev-freeze | ||
| Target Release: | 1.2.3 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph-0.80.8-4.el7cp | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-02-10 01:31:51 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ken Dreyer (Red Hat)
2015-02-09 20:03:24 UTC
Dan mentioned to me a while back that disabling yasm impedes Ceph's performance, so it would be ideal if we re-enabled yasm. It's not clear to me how bad the performance impact would be if we continued to disable yasm - Dan knows more about this than me. Since ICE 1.2.2 shipped with yasm enabled in the build, and product management has clarified that SELinux support is not a blocker for Red Hat Ceph 1.2.3, I think we should re-enable yasm. Boris, do you agree ? Argh, yes, we definitely want it on. CRC and erasure coding benefit greatly from assembly. Hmm, I thought this already was enabled in RHC builds. I will have to enable it in fedora as well once I will have some time to rebase the ceph packages there. AFAIK, it is not that important for client stuff and that is why I just disabled it in base RHEL. Thanks Boris and Dan for helping me understand this issue. I'll re-enable the BuildRequires: yasm in the 0.80.8 packages and get a new RHC build attached to the Errata today. So that this doesn't get lost for Fedora, I've filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190882 in order to track that separately. |