Bug 1191688
| Summary: | [RFE] Unable to import images missing the 'repositories' file | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Pulp | Reporter: | Brenton Leanhardt <bleanhar> |
| Component: | docker-support | Assignee: | pulp-bugs |
| Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | pulp-qe-list |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 2.4.0 | CC: | bleanhar, mhrivnak, sdodson |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-02-19 01:21:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Brenton Leanhardt
2015-02-11 18:24:50 UTC
That sounds reasonable. We initially went with the expectation that an entire repo would be "docker save"d so that tags would be preserved from docker to pulp. As long as you're happy to re-create the tags in pulp, we can certainly do this. Do you happen to have any idea how "docker save" will work with the new manifest data model? If it changes behavior substantially from what docker does currently, it might make sense to target this RFE for that new format. In our case we were planning to recreate the tags in pulp since the environment they came from used tags that didn't follow the formal guidelines for registry.access.redhat.com. Unfortunately I don't know anything about the new manifest data model. I'm a developer on the OpenShift team working with release engineering to publish images for the first time. :) Moved to https://pulp.plan.io/issues/290 |