Bug 1191990
| Summary: | User shouldn't be allowed to create alias/bond interface without specifying identifier in "attached_to/Attached_devices" respectively" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Sachin Ghai <sghai> |
| Component: | WebUI | Assignee: | Marek Hulan <mhulan> |
| WebUI sub component: | Foreman | QA Contact: | Katello QA List <katello-qa-list> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | Docs Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | CC: | bkearney, sthirugn |
| Version: | 6.1.0 | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | ||
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-02-18 07:56:18 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1193987 | ||
|
Description
Sachin Ghai
2015-02-12 11:02:34 UTC
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release. So there are two different things in this BZ and I think neither of them is a bug. 1) VLAN and alias attached_to field If you check Virtual NIC checkbox, then the "Attached to" field is required (marked with *). When you add this interface, modal window disappears but it does not save interface. It becomes a part of host form as a new table row. Now when you hit submit you'll see validation error (as for any other host attribute). So you must specify "Attached to" value. 2) Bond and attached devices field For bonds you can but does not have to enter any device identifier, note that there's no * at that field. You can create a Bond, provisioning template would create a config file but would not set any other interface to be part of this bond. This may be used to create bonds to which you later add interfaces (not during provisioning). Also people may use these for documentation purposes only and not checking managed flag, in which case it's also optional to specify attached devices. Should I close as Not a bug? (In reply to Marek Hulan from comment #3) > So there are two different things in this BZ and I think neither of them is > a bug. > > 1) VLAN and alias attached_to field > If you check Virtual NIC checkbox, then the "Attached to" field is required > (marked with *). When you add this interface, modal window disappears but it > does not save interface. It becomes a part of host form as a new table row. > Now when you hit submit you'll see validation error (as for any other host > attribute). So you must specify "Attached to" value. > Closing this since form validation happens at submit form not at save interface. > 2) Bond and attached devices field > For bonds you can but does not have to enter any device identifier, note > that there's no * at that field. You can create a Bond, provisioning > template would create a config file but would not set any other interface to > be part of this bond. This may be used to create bonds to which you later > add interfaces (not during provisioning). Also people may use these for > documentation purposes only and not checking managed flag, in which case > it's also optional to specify attached devices. > > Should I close as Not a bug? |