Bug 1192882 - python-hwdata is epel not centos base or extras
Summary: python-hwdata is epel not centos base or extras
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Spacewalk
Classification: Community
Component: Clients
Version: 2.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomáš Kašpárek
QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: space28
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-02-16 04:20 UTC by Mohammed Arafa
Modified: 2018-04-20 12:21 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-21 09:14:09 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mohammed Arafa 2015-02-16 04:20:50 UTC
Description of problem:
on centos 6 systems, to install the spacewalk client files you also need python-hwdata

this rpm package is only found in epel. it is not found in any of the centos repos

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jan Pazdziora 2015-02-16 14:02:08 UTC
(In reply to Mohammed Arafa from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> on centos 6 systems, to install the spacewalk client files you also need
> python-hwdata
> 
> this rpm package is only found in epel. it is not found in any of the centos
> repos

And what seems to be the bug? The page

  https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/RegisteringClients

documents the fact that you need EPEL to register clients ...

Comment 2 Mohammed Arafa 2015-02-16 14:40:57 UTC
apologies
the bug being that you need the epel repo for just one package. some servers are behind firewalls and draconian security policies that cannot allow it to either add a new repo or get onto the internet.

my ask is to push to have this rpm package added to the base repo OR even better add it to the spacewalk-client repo.

Comment 3 Jan Pazdziora 2017-10-18 08:13:52 UTC
I assume this change is not going to be implemented. Therefore, proposing closing with NOTABUG.

Comment 4 Tomáš Kašpárek 2017-12-21 09:14:09 UTC
There's no way how we can push this into RHEL/CentOS/spacewalk-client repo and not being forced into taking ownership of the package, which is something we don't want to do.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.