Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1193178

Summary: RHEL7.2 - ghc_arches and ocaml_arches not up to date for ppc64le/aarch64
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Menanteau Guy <menantea>
Component: redhat-rpm-configAssignee: Florian Festi <ffesti>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Karel Srot <ksrot>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.2CC: dhorak, hannsj_uhl, lmiksik, ovasik, pbrobinson, petersen, yselkowi
Target Milestone: pre-dev-freezeKeywords: EasyFix
Target Release: 7.3   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: redhat-rpm-config-9.1.0-69.el7 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 04:46:07 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1197165, 1277314, 1285484, 1289025, 1378657    
Attachments:
Description Flags
add ppc64le epel 7 support in redhat-rpm-config macros
none
Add aarch64 and ppc64le to ghc, ocaml, and GNAT arches (#1193178) none

Description Menanteau Guy 2015-02-16 18:53:55 UTC
Created attachment 992326 [details]
add ppc64le epel 7 support in redhat-rpm-config macros

I am trying to build epel 7 ppc64le using a redhat Server machine based on 
image redhat/beta_cds/RHEL-LE-7.1-Snapshot-5/Server/ppc64le/iso/RHEL-LE-7.1-20150129.0-Server-ppc64le-dvd1.iso

ghc-rpm-macros package reports "error: Architecture is not included: ppc64le"

After looking to redhat-rpm-config-9.1.0, I have seen a discrepancy between the version level used in fedora (redhat-rpm-config-27-1)

ghc_arches and ghc_ocaml at least seems not up to date.

Applying following patch on redhat-rpm-config-9.1.0 to reach the redhat-rpm-config-27-1 version, resolves ghc-rpm-macros build package, but I am not sure 
ocaml changes should be applied like this. Please check.

Comment 3 Yaakov Selkowitz 2015-11-25 23:43:14 UTC
Same applies to aarch64.

Comment 7 Yaakov Selkowitz 2015-12-08 04:42:55 UTC
Created attachment 1103452 [details]
Add aarch64 and ppc64le to ghc, ocaml, and GNAT arches (#1193178)

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 04:46:07 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2372.html