Description of problem:
When a SCVMM provider has both clustered and unclustered hosts the unclustered hosts are omitted from the relationship tree.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
unclustered hosts should sit alongside the clusters in the relationship tree
New commit detected on manageiq/master:
Author: Bronagh Sorota <email@example.com>
AuthorDate: Mon Feb 16 13:30:06 2015 -0500
Commit: Bronagh Sorota <firstname.lastname@example.org>
CommitDate: Mon Feb 16 14:27:26 2015 -0500
Unclustered hosts are missing from relationship tree when a cluster is present
vmdb/app/models/ems_refresh/parsers/scvmm.rb | 14 +++++++++-----
.../models/ems_refresh/refreshers/scvmm_refresher_spec.rb | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
I think screenshot #2 tells you which hosts are part of a cluster and which are stand alone. You can also go to:
- Open the Provider view of an SCVMM provider
- On the top right corner click on Host & Clusters (Under 'relationships')
- Make sure the correct hosts are grouped under the cluster they belong to and make sure any standalone hosts are shown outside the clusters.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.