Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
Going to Content > Red Hat Subscriptions > click a subscription > Associations > Content Hosts, brings you to a table where some of the elements sit on top of each other. The icon shown in the Subscription Status column overlays the Name, as long as the content host name isn't trivially short. This is made worse when the window isn't max width, as each column in the table seems to have the same width, and as the name column shrinks, the status icon sits farther into name, since the content host name isn't truncated.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.0.6

Created attachment 994032 [details]
Subscription Status and Name overlapping

Created attachment 994033 [details]
Subscription Status and Name overlapping (more) with a smaller window size

Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.

Duplicate of BZ #1199626.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1199626 ***