Bug 1194812 - Release notes talk about experimental nova v3 but it does not exist
Summary: Release notes talk about experimental nova v3 but it does not exist
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: doc-Release_Notes
Version: 6.0 (Juno)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ga
: 7.0 (Kilo)
Assignee: Don Domingo
QA Contact: RHOS Documentation Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1190788 1199866
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-02-20 19:51 UTC by David Kranz
Modified: 2015-08-03 17:08 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-19 07:23:09 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description David Kranz 2015-02-20 19:51:25 UTC
Description of problem:


There is a reference to nova v3 at the bottom of 

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/6/html/Release_Notes/ch02s02.html

v3 is "no longer operative" and should not be mentioned.

Comment 3 Stephen Gordon 2015-02-22 09:30:40 UTC
(In reply to David Kranz from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> 
> 
> There is a reference to nova v3 at the bottom of 
> 
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/
> Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/6/html/Release_Notes/ch02s02.html
> 
> v3 is "no longer operative" and should not be mentioned.

Are you sure about that? Because I know of at least customer using it (I believe on OSP6), which is why I requested the explicit note.

Comment 4 David Kranz 2015-02-23 14:11:11 UTC
Sorry for not being specific enough. OSP6 (Juno) does indeed have a nova v3 endpoint. But that code, and its incompatible changes, has already been removed in kilo in favor of a v2.1 and microversions. Any one who is writing code to the v3 api will have to change it with kilo. The release note about tech preview  makes it sound like v3 is the next thing you can get an early start on. I think it would be better to say that v3 exists but should not be used. Adding Dan Smith to correct me if I am wrong about any of this.

Comment 5 Andrew Dahms 2015-03-12 05:10:20 UTC
Assigning to Don for review.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.