Description of problem:
The system is everything install FC2-T2. After running update to
update some packages (including some which had both i386 and x86_64
packages), I noticed that the alternate architecture (i386/i686)
packages had not been deleted after installation whereas the x86_64
packages had been deleted. I queried the system and both packages had
There are a number of issues with alternate architecture support in
up2date (in addition to the one mentioned above):
1) If you have grub-0.94-4 installed and no 32-bit libraries, then
up2date fails with "glibc-2.3.3-27 is already installed" error
message. The problem is that the newer grub-0.94-5 requires the 32-bit
glibc and up2date gets confused by the fact that it needs to install
the 32-bit glibc while it already has the 64-bit one installed.
2) When the 64-bit version of foo is installed, but the 32-bit is not,
there does not seem to be a way to tell up2date to install the 32-bit
Fedora Core 2 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for
security updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please
reopen and reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a
security issue and hasn't been resolved in the current FC3 updates or
in the FC4 test release, reopen and change the version to match.
NEEDINFO_ENG has been deprecated in favor of NEEDINFO or ASSIGNED. Changing
status to ASSIGNED for ENG review.
I have not seen this problem lately ... especially with FC4 or FC5 which is what
I am running now. Not sure but should this be closed as fixed in latested releases?
up2date is no longer shipped with Fedora Core; it's functionality
has been replaced by pup, found in the pirut package. The only fixes
likely to be made to up2date in RedHat Linux and earlier Fedora Core
versions are security fixes by Fedora Legacy. This does not seem to
be a security bug, so I'm closing it. In addition, it seems to be fixed in FC4
If the problem is appropriate to RHEL and occurs to a user there, it
can be filed as such.