Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Run/perl-Test-Run.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Run/perl-Test-Run-0.0302-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: These Perl modules are an improved test harness based on Test::Harness, but more modular, extensible and object-oriented. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar
lib/Test/Run/Straps_GplArt.pm appears to be licensed under `GPLv2+ or Artistic'. Your License tag should reflect that. No other issues found.
You are right. Updated package is on the same URL.
--- a/perl-Test-Run.spec +++ b/perl-Test-Run.spec @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ Version: 0.0302 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Extensible and object-oriented test harness for TAP scripts # lib and other code: MIT -# lib/Test/Run/Core_GplArt.pm: GPL+ or Artistic -# t/lib: GPL+ or Artistic -License: (GPL+ or Artistic) and MIT +# lib/Test/Run/Core_GplArt.pm: GPLv2+ or Artistic +# t/lib/Test (not installed): GPL+ or Artistic +License: (GPLv2+ or Artistic) and MIT Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Run/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SH/SHLOMIF/Test-Run-%{version}.tar.gz Well, the license of lib/Test/Run/Core_GplArt.pm is still `GPL+ or Artistic'. It's just lib/Test/Run/Straps_GplArt.pm that uses `GPLv2+ or Artistic'. The incorrect spec comment aside, even though this is acceptable, you're effectively relicensing the package now. I think the correct tag should be `(GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) and MIT'.
I mistaken files. Updated packages are on the same address.
Ack, all good now. Approving.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Run Short Description: Extensible and object-oriented test harness for TAP scripts Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Run/ Owners: ppisar jplesnik psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Thank you for the review and the repository.