Bug 119764 – updated kernel now missing ~/ for users

Bug 119764 - updated kernel now missing ~/ for users

Summary:	updated kernel now missing ~/ for users

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 119597

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	pump (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	high Severity high
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Eido Inoue
QA Contact:	Brian Brock
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2004-04-01 20:07 EST by Scott Sloan
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-02-21 14:02:20 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Here is the output from the logs (181.64 KB, text/plain) 2004-04-01 20:41 EST, Scott Sloan	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Scott Sloan 2004-04-01 20:07:13 EST

Description of problem:

Upgraded to latest kernel in the development tree, everything went
great no problems. rebooted, and went to sign in, only to recieve a
message say that /home/scott was not present. open vitural terminal,
logged in as root, ls /home/scott -all   and everything was still in
tack. 

rebooted to kernel-2.6.3 and was abled to log in as scott with no
error messages

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

[scott@localhost scott]$ rpm -q kernel

kernel-2.6.4-1.300

Comment 1 Scott Sloan 2004-04-01 20:09:35 EST

thinking this to could be related to 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119517

and

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119763

Comment 2 Scott Sloan 2004-04-01 20:41:00 EST

Created attachment 99056 [details]
Here is the output from the logs

Comment 3 Scott Sloan 2004-04-02 03:03:32 EST

If my research is right, pump is a dhclient. Can someone point me to
what I'm missing as to how this is a pump bug? Thanks.

Comment 4 Scott Sloan 2004-04-02 09:04:10 EST


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 119597 ***

Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 14:02:20 EST

Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.