RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1197804 - KDE Patch missing.
Summary: KDE Patch missing.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kdelibs
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: pre-dev-freeze
: ---
Assignee: Jan Grulich
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1158510 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1393395
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-03-02 16:20 UTC by Michael
Modified: 2017-03-06 11:13 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-23 16:18:32 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
CentOS 7800 0 None None None Never
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:2282 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE kde-workspace, attica, bluedevil, and qt bug fix and enhancement update 2015-11-23 21:13:41 UTC

Description Michael 2015-03-02 16:20:46 UTC 
Description of problem:
In Konqueror (and most other kde applications) the printer settings previous selections are not automatically remembered next time printer dialogue is used nor is there a method to save the settings. This is both: time consuming when multiple pages with same settings requirements are printed.
This bug keeps coming back, this is the fourth time I've ran into this in different releases.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kdelibs.i686                             6:4.14.4-2.fc21

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Using Konqueror Browser
2.File => Print
3.Options => HTML Settings
4.Uncheck Print Images
5.Click Print
6.Then Repeat 2 and 3

Actual results:
forgets user selections

Expected results:
remember which options are ticked / unticked.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2015-03-02 16:47:22 UTC 
I think one problem here is that patch only dealt with khtml, and fedora uses kwebkit by default (though centos7 should be using khtml)

In the meantime, we can verify the history of that patch.
Comment 2 Michael 2015-04-14 15:54:57 UTC 
is there any progress with this bug?

does the web engine make any difference to the print dialog that's displayed?
Comment 3 Rex Dieter 2015-04-14 15:58:16 UTC 
Unfortunately yes, some konqueror options (like this one) may well be specific to khtml
Comment 4 Michael 2015-04-15 07:19:42 UTC 
this bug also applies to

Name        : kdelibs
Arch        : x86_64
Epoch       : 6
Version     : 4.10.5
Release     : 6.el7.centos
Comment 5 Rex Dieter 2015-04-15 13:24:55 UTC 
You said fedora 21 in the initial submission.

Reassigning to rhel
Comment 6 Michael 2015-04-15 13:28:45 UTC 
This bug is present in Fedora21, Fedora 22, CentOS7, Centos 7.1. we experienced this in older software versions and someone inhouse wrote the patch discussed above. every new release introduces the bug again.
Comment 8 Rex Dieter 2015-04-15 13:46:27 UTC 
OK, let's focus on a single release (or product fedora vs rhel) then to not complicate matters.

I'll reassign back to fedora (hrm... except it seems I can't now). Lukas, can you do it?
Comment 9 Michael 2015-04-15 13:55:23 UTC 
To be honest this is a bit of a learning curve for me, I'm accustomed to reading bug reports but this is the first one I filed.

If I should have pointed this at another version then I apologise.
Comment 10 Rex Dieter 2015-04-15 13:57:31 UTC 
No problem, comment #6 clarified things nicely and cleared my own confusion.
Comment 11 Michael 2015-07-08 10:59:31 UTC 
Has there been any progress with this bug? Will it be patched in Fedora23? anytime soon in Centos7 / 7.1?
Comment 12 Rex Dieter 2015-07-08 11:39:09 UTC 
I'm not aware of anyone working on implementing this (for kwebkitpart).

You do have the option of reverting to using khtml (what the original patch was written for), then it should work as before.
Comment 13 Rex Dieter 2015-07-08 11:40:11 UTC 
Oops, nevermind per comment #3, rhel should already be using khtml.  so, apparently something regressed since the patch was originally introduced.
Comment 15 Jan Grulich 2015-07-16 08:57:39 UTC 
The patch is indeed missing in RHEL 7.x, I don't know what it was dropped, but I can include it back. I'll try to include it in RHEL 7.2 as it's a regression compared to previous releases.
Comment 22 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-23 16:18:32 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2282.html
Comment 23 Jan Grulich 2017-03-06 10:50:36 UTC 
*** Bug 1158510 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.