Description of problem: selinux enforce ON (setenforce 1). Using the packages from development on 3 April 04, I selected the following for update: arts-* elfutils-* policy policy-sources policycoreutils selinux-doc I ended up with two version of policy-sources in the rpm db. While I still have everything, what information do you wnat me to capture. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): FC2T2 plus current (development) up2date and rpm-* How reproducible: Yes. First time on x86_64 and then reporduced it on a ix86 system. Actual results: policy-1.9.2-9 policycoreutils-1.9.2-1 policy-sources-1.9.2-9 policy-sources-1.9.2-5 Expected results: policy-1.9.2-9 policycoreutils-1.9.2-1 policy-sources-1.9.2-9 Additional info: While this "did not delete old package" is clear, I have also had occurances of a new package failing to install but up2date did not detect this and removed the old package (leaving nothing installed). One of these occurances was for gdm IIRC. What I am not sure of is if the actual files were deleted or just the rpm DB screwed up. I have more or less all of the updates issued since FC2T1 was released in a local repository and could possibly recreate the situation if needed ... but it would not be easy and I would prefer not to do that.
selected results of rpm -qa --last selinux-doc-1.8-3 Sat 03 Apr 2004 04:32:42 PM EST policy-sources-1.9.2-9 Sat 03 Apr 2004 04:32:37 PM EST elfutils-devel-0.95-2 Sat 03 Apr 2004 04:32:34 PM EST elfutils-libelf-devel-0.95-2 Sat 03 Apr 2004 04:32:33 PM EST arts-devel-1.2.1-2 Sat 03 Apr 2004 04:32:33 PM EST policycoreutils-1.9.2-1 Sat 03 Apr 2004 04:32:32 PM EST policy-1.9.2-9 Sat 03 Apr 2004 04:32:32 PM EST elfutils-0.95-2 Sat 03 Apr 2004 04:32:30 PM EST arts-1.2.1-2 Sat 03 Apr 2004 04:32:29 PM EST elfutils-libelf-0.95-2 Sat 03 Apr 2004 04:32:09 PM EST rp-pppoe-3.5-14 Fri 02 Apr 2004 05:01:04 PM EST ... rpmdb-fedora-1.91-0.20040402 Fri 02 Apr 2004 03:52:58 PM EST policy-sources-1.9.2-5 Fri 02 Apr 2004 03:52:47 PM EST libselinux-devel-1.9-1 Fri 02 Apr 2004 03:52:45 PM EST
It is interesting that something in up2date detected that packages had not been processed or processed properly because the total progress bad was not at the complete point when the "finished" message appears.
er, no idea... afaik nothing in the code has changed to cause anything to not delete (especially on "-U" style updates). Might be an rpm issue, trying to reproduce...
I am closing this as I do not believe it happens with the latest policy. Dan