Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 119987 - initscripts code cleanup
initscripts code cleanup
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: initscripts (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Bill Nottingham
Brock Organ
Depends On:
Blocks: FC2Target
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2004-04-04 13:48 EDT by Steve Grubb
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:43 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 7,.51-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-05-04 12:28:21 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Bug fix patch (5.70 KB, patch)
2004-04-04 13:49 EDT, Steve Grubb
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Steve Grubb 2004-04-04 13:48:11 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.4.2)

Description of problem:
During code review found: leaked memory, not properly checking file
descriptors before using them, a call to poll that returned -1 because
of EINTR is being processed as if it were a valid return from poll,
return code from forkCommand not being used at all, testing of device
file susceptible to races in usernetctl, and userctl tests were
unneccessarily case sensitive.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Found by code inpection

Additional info:

I have a patch that I will attach. Please consider applying it before
fedora core 2 final.
Comment 1 Steve Grubb 2004-04-04 13:49:52 EDT
Created attachment 99099 [details]
Bug fix patch

Please consider applying this.
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2004-05-04 12:28:21 EDT
Someone actually looked through process.c. Yikes, my condolances (it
should really be taken out and shot.)

Some of the forkCommand stuff is only correct due to the fact that
it's only called with certain arguments; but that's ok.

Thanks for looking at this... will be in 7.51-1.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.