Bug 1200351 - Review Request: rubygem-fog-ecloud - Module for the 'fog' gem to support Terremark EnterpriseCloud
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-fog-ecloud - Module for the 'fog' gem to support Terr...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Josef Stribny
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1200310
Blocks: 1152158
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-03-10 11:32 UTC by Vít Ondruch
Modified: 2016-01-04 05:54 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rubygem-fog-ecloud-0.0.2-1.fc23
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-19 08:55:14 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
jstribny: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Vít Ondruch 2015-03-10 11:32:03 UTC 
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/vondruch/public_git/rubygem-fog-ecloud.git/tree/rubygem-fog-ecloud.spec?id=19a29ce9beedc8c91647999204eec9a8a1196244
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-fog-ecloud-0.0.2-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description: This library can be used as a module for `fog` or as standalone provider to use the Terremark EnterpriseCloud in applications.
Fedora Account System Username: vondruch
Comment 1 Vít Ondruch 2015-03-11 12:19:09 UTC 
Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9203758
Comment 2 Josef Stribny 2015-03-13 07:18:44 UTC 
Taking.
Comment 3 Josef Stribny 2015-03-13 07:36:59 UTC 
Package builds, installs and runs. Spec looks fine and tests are passing => APPROVED.
Comment 4 Vít Ondruch 2015-03-13 13:06:04 UTC 
Thanks for the review.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: rubygem-fog-ecloud
Short Description: Module for the 'fog' gem to support Terremark EnterpriseCloud
Upstream URL: https://github.com/fog/fog-ecloud
Owners: vondruch
Branches: 
InitialCC:
Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2015-03-13 13:43:40 UTC 
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.