Hi, With influxdb version 0.9 moving to completely utilise rocksdb, we probably want to look at expanding this package to fully provide a rocksdb compiled binary. That is, a rocksdb package that has /usr/bin/rocksdb, as well as the devel package with the raw go code for deps (which this package currently provides) Regards, Graeme
(In reply to Graeme Gillies from comment #0) > With influxdb version 0.9 moving to completely utilise rocksdb, we probably > want to look at expanding this package to fully provide a rocksdb compiled > binary. > > That is, a rocksdb package that has /usr/bin/rocksdb, as well as the devel > package with the raw go code for deps (which this package currently provides) Graeme, what do you expect from /usr/bin/rocksdb? When trying to compile rocksdb from https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git it doesn't include such a binary. Imho the packge rocksdb should just include *versioned* shared library (done by `make shared_lib PLATFORM_SHARED_EXT=so PLATFORM_SHARED_VERSIONED=true`) and rocksdb-devel package should contain the header files and unversioned library symlink. No evidence about rocksdb binary.
Hi, I am incredibly sorry you are correct. I got confused with influxdb and rocksdb in this case. You are right, this bug should be renamed/changed to having rocksdb shared library shipped in fedora so that it can be used by this packaged and eventually influxdb. Thanks again, Regards, Graeme
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle. Changing version to '23'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Hey all -- this is almost a year old, wondering what the current status is? I have another use case for this: the rocksdb shared library is required to run IBM's hyperledger implementation "fabric". https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric Which we're in the process of getting running on Fedora, and right now we have to build RocksDB shared_lib from source, which inflates the dependency list to include the compile chain and a bunch of ruby gems which are useless during runtime.
Matej?
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/1114
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Please, enable/import also Java binding mvn(org.rocksdb:rocksdbjni) [1] used in Apache Kafka Regards [1] https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/tree/master/java
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle. Changing version to '26'.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 26 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 26. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '26'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 26 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Bumping to rawhide.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle. Changing version to '29'.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 29 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 29 on 2019-11-26. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '29'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 29 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Bumping to rawhide, as this is request is effectively evergreen.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle. Changing version to 32.
I am sorry I have some questions about rocksdb.spec https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocksdb/blob/f29/f/rocksdb.spec 1. what's the puppose of three lines removing: rm -rf third-party/gtest-1.7.0 rm java/benchmark/src/main/java/org/rocksdb/benchmark/DbBenchmark.java rm build_tools/gnu_parallel Is there something related with LICENCE? 2. why there is no Requires in spec file, should we have to add the dependencies as https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/master/INSTALL.md#dependencies Thanks all!
This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '32'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 32 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 32 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2021-05-25. Fedora 32 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 35 development cycle. Changing version to 35.
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 35 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 35 on 2022-12-13. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of '35'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' to a later Fedora Linux version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora Linux 35 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version prior to this bug being closed.
Fedora Linux 35 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2022-12-13. Fedora Linux 35 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora Linux please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see the version field. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an active release. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.