Spec URL: https://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/lpod-python.spec SRPM URL: https://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/lpod-python-1.1.5-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: lpod-python is the python implementation of the lpOD Project (Languages & Platforms OpenDocument, definition of a Free Software API implementing the ISO/IEC 26300 standard). Fedora Account System Username: dtardon
Name should be python-lpod according to the guidelines [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29]. Add Provides: python2-lpod = %{version}-%{release} Use %license macro for the license files. What about python3 support? Looks fine.
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1) > Name should be python-lpod according to the guidelines > [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_. > 28python_modules.29]. On the other side, the guidelines for python3 only require that "all python3 modules MUST have python3 in their name." Are the rules stricter for python2? Also note that this is only the source name. The rpms it builds are named python-*. > Add Provides: python2-lpod = %{version}-%{release} Okay. > Use %license macro for the license files. Okay. > What about python3 support? Possibly.
I'd find it a gratuitous source of confusion to have python-lpod built from lpod-python. lpod-python would normally be used for a python subpackage built off a main package. You are right that the guidelines do not explicitly specify that either version is correct. So it's your choice. >> What about python3 support? > Possibly. Oh, I looked at the sources now. They don't seem python3 compatible at all. So the point is moot for now.
Any plans to continue with this?
Let's close this. Feel free to restart the process at any time.